Automated Testing Software

- Test case editor: I would be nice if we could edit "inline" without having to open the full edit popup, sometimes you just want to make a change on the title or update from Manual to Automated, and it takes a lot of time to do so through the pop up.

- Grouping of test cases into test suites: it lacks the concept of test suite, you can only create folders within a project, but it has several disadvantages, if you want one test cases to be part of two different tests suites, you have to duplicate it, which makes it a pain to maintain. Also, if you want to get statistics about a particular set of tests, you cant, since the dashboard makes its calculations base on all the test cases, without being able to discriminate based on folder (having test suites would be better)

- AI automation: Competitors like LambdaTest are ahead on AI features, Kane AI offers a platform for writing test cases in natural language and execute them, which can boost QA productivity, Browserstack lacks a feature like that Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Test case management, mobile automation on real devices, reporting on QA status Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user experience is confusing. In which menu I can find things is not intuitive. The rule set works but I can't point a customer here since a customer will need a separate UI with simple toggles, maybe an idea could be to be able to generate custom UIs from rule sets. I also want to be able to have a key casing convention for UPPER_SNAKECASE which is the most common one used for environment variables, since I want to be able to replace environment variable settings with feature flags if they exist. The "hello world" setup for Launch Darkly is not something you would want to use in production, so it would be good is there was more framework related setup done. The setup in ASP.NET core for reading in feature flags as options could have been provided by I library for ease of use, instead of me having to develop the code myself. There also seems to be a lack of tutorials on YouTube which gives the impression that this is not a product commonly used. When entering the webpage I would expect to get online help interactivly showing what the product can do, instead of just showing unfamiliar terms in my face. I do not like the need to wait for sampled data from the user before being able to setup a rule against that user, I would want to be able to have a predefined rule sets even without anyone having made a call to Launch Darkly. My favorite environments keep disappearing so I have to add them again every time I login. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its helping me allow customers to try out features in production by toggling them on and off.

It is probably overkill and It would be beneficial to be able to configure the actual features I am able to see since most will never be used.

It would also be good to be able to show the customer a simpler interface with the limited ability to just toggle features, that was adaptable to mobile screens etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Actually, I don't have any dislike but yes, I can say one things is you need to increase free testing time so everyone can test your app an make purchase decision. 5 minutes is not enough for testing. But overall good experience with this tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a senior QA, we need to check all mobile app in final step. And we purchased many real devices for this testing but now we don't need to purchase any mobile devices because now using LambdaTest, I am able to test all app in different mobile devices that they providing. This tool save our cost and boost productivity because now we can test any app in any screen size in any time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub is arguably the best platform, however, as a beginner, I felt overwhelmed by some of the functions GitHub offered and the complexities of getting started with Git. For example, the interface feels cluttered with too much going on at times. Private repositories and team features were also limited on the free plan, and responses from customer support for free users took forever at times. GitHub also did not handle monorepos efficiently, nor did it handle binary files when leveraging Git LFS. Some integrations added additional setup times to be useful, and I feel the project board experience is shallow compared to dedicated tools like Jira or Trello. All that goes to say, I think it is a fantastic tool, but GitHub has room to improve the usability, flexibility, pricing models, and performance at the enterprise scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub addresses the problems of collaboration, version control and code management by bringing a group of people to work together from one place, in an efficient and organized way. Code reviews, issue management and pull requests, are all captured within GitHub, with easy-to-find histories of changes and history. Automating workflows with GitHub Actions (for workflows such as testing and deployment) is easy as well. In addition to all of the benefit possibilities from GitHub alone, its integrations with services and cloud platforms provide a streamlined development experience. It has increased my productivity, ensured code quality and simplified communication with my team—whether I am working alone or with many people. With everything in one location—from documentation, all the way to CI/CD—it has saved me time and helped me keep my project organized and scalable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you are a small company or you are a sole developer, the price could feel a bit high. Not saying it's not worthy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Absolutely Yes! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a Mobile App developer I was in the need of having a centralized CI/CD server on premisses for my apps. Before Bitrise I used Jenkins but it forced me to be always within the network to be able to interact with the pipelines.

I just hooked my repository and it builds and test my apps on every PR merged into our main branch.

Automatic releases to the App stores.

What else can we ask for! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are very few downsides, but if I had to mention one, it would be the limited number of integrations with external tools compared to some competitors. Also, initial setup for beginners might require a short learning curve. However, the documentation is strong and helps bridge that gap quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Apidog helps us streamline our entire API lifecycle — from planning and designing endpoints to testing and documenting them. Instead of juggling multiple tools, we now manage everything in one platform. This has significantly improved our team’s collaboration, reduced API errors, and sped up the development and debugging process. It has also helped us onboard new team members faster, thanks to the well-organized API documentation and mock server support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hidden costs: Need to pay extra for: Add-ons like Marketing Cloud, Service Cloud, CPQ, etc. Customization and integration often require hiring Salesforce-certified consultants, which adds to costs

Hard for non-tech users to understand terminology (objects, Apex, flows, triggers) and navigate between Classic and Lightning interfaces.

Note: if you are using large datasets - then system lag time is high.

Customising can be tough as it requires more ongoing maintenance, i.e we need dedicated salesforce team/admin to just keep things running.

There is a risk of functionality breaking during platform updates (which happen three times a year). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Salesforce lightning is helping me boost productivity and makes our work [and life] easier by doing the followingg:

Manage Cases: Track, assign, and resolv customer service issues very efficiently.

Handle Contacts and Accounts: Maintain customer and company records and link them to related data.

Create Reports and Dashboards: Generate and visualize performance metrics, trends, and KPIs.

Collaborate via Chatter: Communicate with team members, share updates, and follow important records.

Store and Share Files: Upload documents and attach them to relevant records for easy access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab support is a factor that I don't like about GitLab. They are too slow to respond to P1 incidents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The first problem that GitLab is solving for our organization is the source control. It is very easy to create/clone/import repositories on GitLab.

We are creating GitLab repositories/projects using Terraform and that explains the amazing documentation of GitLab Terraform provider.

The next thing that GitLab is helping us is the CI/CD. GitLab has the abillity to create downstream pipelines that helps us in managing deployment pipelines for various environments originating from a single CI pipeline. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Given that I only used the demo, I didn’t get to explore every feature in depth. That said, the reporting features seemed a bit limited compared to more established platforms. Power users may miss advanced filtering and analytics. Also, there’s no offline access, which could be a drawback for teams that occasionally work in low-connectivity environments. Still, for a tool this easy to pick up, those trade-offs felt minor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr helps simplify the process of writing and managing test cases, which is especially helpful for teams that include both technical and non-technical contributors like myself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any major dislikes about Qase. The UI is visually appealing, though some areas could benefit from a more modern update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keeping our test management efforts in a single place, where it can be organized and monitored by all the applicable persons in our organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, it's hard to find much to complain about. The pricing isn't cheap, but after seeing what goes into doing this well... (the operational overhead, the QA expertise, the infrastructure)... I'm pretty confident we'd spend more trying to replicate this internally and probably do a worse job. So even that's not really a complaint. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before QA Wolf, we were in the classic trap of knowing we needed better testing but not having the bandwidth to build it right. Manual testing was eating up time and we had this constant worry after deployments about what might have broken.

QA Wolf became our safety net. Now we deploy with confidence because their automated tests catch issues before they hit production, and our team can focus on building features instead of repetitive manual testing. It's like having a dedicated QA team with enterprise-level expertise without the headache of building it ourselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Initial configuration are a bit complex in nature which requires more time and knowledge to optimize the workflows.

Customized deployments require workarounds are some processes are not straightforward Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Copado DevOps is helping us solve key business challenges related to Salesforce development and deployment. Before using Copado, our release cycles were slow and prone to errors due to manual deployments and lack of version control. With Copado, we've automated our deployment process, reducing downtime and ensuring smoother, more reliable releases. It also helps with compliance and audit tracking, which is critical for maintaining regulatory standards. Additionally, Copado improves collaboration between developers and admins by providing better visibility into changes and preventing code conflicts. This had led to faster delivery of new features, improved software quality, and increased business agility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The security and the transactional processes in human in loop need some enhancements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helped us in managing ITSM and customer relationship. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some missing important features at the moment, like loops or conditional branching in test scenarios - so you can't build and maintain complex scenarios easily. Once those features are there, this product is top-tier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Building adhoc test automation scenarios. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like how some things are becoming ultra premium features (behind firewall deployments etc). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helps solve the who and when problem - uploading files manually, running commands etc Everything is now auditable Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although the staff is incredibly quick to feature requests, it would be great to have more integrated project management tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our sprints were delayed by regression testing. We reduced regression time by half, automated 80% of our test cases, and enhanced the quality of our output with ContextQA. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Api client lacks of archives for the previous versions. Besides, It is complicated to reach out to the support team payment issues. In addition to this, The Api client moves from an open source initiative to a licensed software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The issues sorted out are numerous. Firstly, Postman resolves the methodology to develop Automate Programmable Interfaces. Postman is an API client that provides solution for unit tests, scenario tests or validation tests.. There is an opportunity to work without sillos through Postman.Besides, the API client is a helpful tool for API monitoring, API observability and API governance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Context-Driven Approach: While ACCELQ’s context-driven approach to test automation is powerful, it requires careful planning. Without a well-structured approach, the element repository can become messy, leading to confusion and inefficiencies in managing test assets.

This is not the drawback of the tool however a mandatory process for better management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I worked on a Proof of Concept (POC) for use cases specific to the Salesforce platform. ACCELQ proved to have great potential in automating test cases for a dynamic platform like Salesforce. To my surprise, I was able to automate the test cases faster than expected.

When the test scripts were revisited, they were found to be stable, requiring only minimal maintenance, which was effortless to handle. I efficiently utilized ACCELQ's locator-free identification feature, which added to the ease of automation.

Another standout feature was the tool’s intuitive nature—there was no significant learning curve. As I started using the tool, its user-friendly design made it easy to get familiar with its features.

For execution, I used a local agent. The execution process was not only fast but also unattended, requiring no separate effort or enablement. This made the automation experience seamless and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.