What do you like best about TimeClock Plus by TCP?
TCP is highly customizable which allows you to configure it at multiple levels (i.e., company, department, division, individual). It also comes with many features such as reporting (scheduled and on-demand), scheduling, time and cost code configuration, allowing for custom fields to be added and included on reports, geofencing for mobile users, and auditing.
My company has about 450 employees and supervisors using TCP every day. Because the system is extremely customizable, the administrator of the system can configure the system to be very easy to use. I started working with TCP in 2016 in version 6.0, then we moved to 7.0, and then to the cloud in 2023. TCP was very helpful with all of the implementations. Using the TCP 7.0 cloud version alleviates our past burden or checking for and applying system updates, which is a great feature. We are currently working with a TCP team to integrate TCP with my company's overall time and reporting system (Oracle).
I have contacted customer support several times, and the TCP support staff have been very professional and helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about TimeClock Plus by TCP?
Because the system is so customizable, it can be difficult to manage, if you don't know what you're doing. I have been the administrator of the system for several years, and I find the administrative-type documentation onhow to configure the system, along with what some of the configuration settings mean or do, to be greatly lacking. Many of TCP's features intertwine, so if you change one setting somewhere you might be inadvertently affecting another feature somewhere else. Also, many features involve multiple settings that must be set in order for the feature to work correctly (i.e., setting up leave request notifications, etc.)
I am the administrator of the system, and often times I have to extract specific information from the system that is not included on a canned report or via the Export feature, like reports that list "override" settings, the employees contained in employee filters (for all filters in a single report), autobreak settings, or a means of comparing Employee and User Role settings. With our TCP 6.0 on-site system, I could get almost any piece of data I needed via an ODBC to the database; however, with the cloud version, there is no API, so I can no longer extract special, administrative-type information.
Although TCP has many features, a couple of feature that is missing are a way to prevent leave request messages from being displayed at the clock and a way to customize the "Subject" in a leave request notification email.
I also find the TCP support web site difficult to use; even if I select "TimeClock Plus" as the product, when I search for something, the system may return results for a different software platform. This is very frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.