742 Stack Overflow for Teams Reviews
The search functionality works great. The UI is really snappy and responsive. Part of a beloved SO product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
No hierarchy in Articles/Collections is a show stopper.
No inline comments is a very big disadvantage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is hard to keep an updated wiki. And questions and answers by email get lost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In my company too many labels were created. In the beginning this was confusing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Keeps knowledge organized. Ranking system lets you know how reliable the answer is, and the format lets you read through the answer quickly (unlike wiki, for example) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The search system - not the fact that it misses something, but that results do not return in a regular google search like "regular" stackoverflow results Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
SO is so familiar to developers, it should be natural and easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Comments are limited in length. I often need to edit the question instead of respond to an answer that's not quite there.
IMO, some AI to suggest tags would also be good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Slack Integration with StackOverflow is very helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Right now the time to onboard new users in StackOverflow because it's not yet in their blood. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Similarity with regular stackoverflow, juggling between public and teams Q&A is great Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It can be abused to serve as documentation. But that is more a training problem than a solution issue Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The asynchronous nature is extremely useful as a remote employee. Things disappear in chat and they can be hard to index. It's nice to have an architected, clean resource for knowledge. The Slack integration keeps folks on their toes and the MSFT integration should extend usage beyond software engineering teams. It's also a fantastic way for folks in Rev, Ops, Marketing and Product to communicate with tech teams in a familiar, intuitive and trusted environment. It also shows these teams that the business really cares about the productivity and well-being of engineers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Adoption is the biggest hurdle here. Once that is achieved even at a small level, the snowball effect comes into play. It becomes an integral and asynchronous resource for quick and reliable answers. It can be really hard to get folks with no previous experience with SO to jump right into teams; tool overload is very real.
Attaching reputation points more strongly to real-life incentives - they don't have to be tangible or monetary - would have an impact, IMO. For example, X level of engagement leads to a discount on other SO products or channel partner initiatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Same functionality as on main StackOverflow, but internally. Amazing search and linking to internal KBs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Works amazing for developers, but non-developers department finds UI a little bit awkward Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
