741 Stack Overflow for Teams Reviews
Searching for answers to existing issues is super easy and adding new questions to be answered is also really easy. This is much, much better than having some network folder of documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is an onboarding process for your group but it still takes everyone getting onboard with the idea of using the application. This may be difficult for people to get used to using a website as a knowledge center. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Familiar, decades-proven UI: voting, comments, tags, @mentions, reputation system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing on the product side, but success of SOfT in a company is rather organizationally challenging: the product needs a lot of engagement from the most knowledgeable people in the company (usually senior staff and leads) in order to bring value. If critical mass is not gained, questions remain with no answer or poor answers, and the tool loses credibility from users (askers). Plus, proper positioning in the company is required so that SOfT is not shadowed by other company tools such as messengers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I do like that it share all the functionalities from StackOverflow while keeping private our knowledge. Sometimes we have to assure that the research information don't leaks and this provide as a very effective way to handle that. We also like the functinoa Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Probably the user limit count, I would also like to have a view where you can explore related questions and answers based on similarities. Something like a graph exploration visualizer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
People often praise Stack Overflow for Teams for its ability to encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing within my team or organization. It lets me and my colleagues ask questions and get answers from each other, creating a private, secure space for exchanging knowledge. This is particularly useful when we're onboarding new team members, as they can easily access previously asked questions and answers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1. Pricing: I find the pricing for private teams to be bit high, especially for small teams or startups with limited budgets.
2. User Interface: I find the interface not as intuitive as I would like. I feel it could be more user-friendly.
3. Integration: While Stack Overflow for Teams does offer integration with some tools, I wish for more seamless integration with a wider range of tools and platforms.
4. Customization: I wish I had more options to customize the look and feel of my private Stack Overflow for Teams space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Its easy to use, the menu is clear and the alerts are useful, rather than feeling like Spam.
Where we've had common problems across various teams it gets visibility of the issue or question to other people within the organisation with different ideas or engages someone who's had a similar issue and already found a solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It doesnt blend seamlessly with stackoverflow and you find yourself having to create a separate account on there - would be better if it was one site with teams/public sections instead of working like 2 separate websites. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Question digest functionality, key words. A real differentiator for my use case is the ability to target specific individuals who I think might have the answer to my question, which is mostly for customer support and understanding technical details. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Frequency of use - i don't use it that often. I have used it 3 times in the last 1.5 months. Perhaps I don't know enough of what it can do or what it should be used for Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Friendly and intuitive interface, familiar to developers.
Good onboarding process and support
Good dashboards and success metrics Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Articles are difficult to manage - somewhat like a wiki, yet not at the same time. The permissions model for the articles is confusing (though this has changed recently). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Have used regular StackOverFlow as a software engineer for many years.
Now as a software support technician, I better understand the need to document answers to common and rare questions.
I am trying to get my current company to implement StackOverFlow for teams for our Tech support team. Right now, we have answers in MS Teams, word documents, excel files, power point slides, and OneNote files.
I did look at some other Knowledge Base products. I could not get X-wiki to work for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not sure of any downsides.
The only part not working for me is not your issue but mine. I just have to make time to enter our data into our private StackOverFlow For Teams web page. Once I have more info, then I will present to my superviser. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Stack Overflow for Teams is a great tool because it allows questions within our company to be answered by those who know the answers best. I also appreciate that I can answer other questions I happen to see that I know as well. Lastly, as a developer, I appreicate the ability to view the app in 'dark mode' and view on mobile. The experience is quite good on both desktop and mobile. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have no major complaints being a user. I appreciate my company investing the money for the license. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
