- Home
- ...
- Test Management Tools
- Xray Test Management
- Zephyr Enterprise
- Xray Test Management-vs-Zephyr Enterprise
Compare Xray Test Management and Zephyr Enterprise 
- Users report that Zephyr Enterprise excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.8, which allows for efficient organization and retrieval of test cases, while Xray Test Management shines even brighter with a score of 9.4, indicating a more robust and user-friendly repository system.
- Reviewers mention that Zephyr Enterprise offers strong Reporting capabilities with a score of 9.2, providing detailed insights into testing progress, whereas Xray Test Management's reporting features are rated lower at 7.8, suggesting that users may find it less comprehensive for their reporting needs.
- G2 users highlight that both products have similar scores for Integration at 8.3, indicating that they both support a variety of integrations with other tools, but users on G2 note that Zephyr Enterprise has a slight edge in ease of integration with CI/CD tools.
- Users say that Zephyr Enterprise's Version Control feature is rated at 8.8, which allows for better management of test case versions, while Xray Test Management falls short with a score of 7.6, leading to potential challenges in tracking changes over time.
- Reviewers mention that Xray Test Management is favored for its Scaling capabilities, scoring 8.8, which makes it more suitable for mid-market companies looking to grow, while Zephyr Enterprise's score of 7.9 suggests it may not scale as effectively for larger teams.
- Users report that Zephyr Enterprise has a higher score for Test Diversity at 8.9, indicating a wider range of testing types supported, while Xray Test Management's score of 8.5 suggests it may have slightly less flexibility in this area.
Easy to use, easily integrates in Jira making it smooth for project managers and product owners.
It's a bit of a learning curve when getting started. It took our team about a year to realize that there are so many other tools to utilize, but didn't really understand how to get to that point. On top of that, Xray is different by JIRA account type, so...
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
Easy to use, easily integrates in Jira making it smooth for project managers and product owners.
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
It's a bit of a learning curve when getting started. It took our team about a year to realize that there are so many other tools to utilize, but didn't really understand how to get to that point. On top of that, Xray is different by JIRA account type, so...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
