Compare TestLink and Zephyr Enterprise 
- Users report that TestLink excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.7, which allows for efficient management of test cases and easy retrieval, while Zephyr Enterprise, with a score of 8.8, also offers robust test management but is noted for its superior Reporting capabilities, scoring 9.2, making it easier for teams to generate insights and track progress.
- Reviewers mention that TestLink's Integration capabilities, rated at 7.8, can be somewhat limited compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which scores 8.3 and is praised for its seamless integration with various CI/CD tools, enhancing the overall testing workflow.
- G2 users highlight that TestLink provides a solid Test Diversity score of 8.5, allowing for a wide range of testing types, but Zephyr Enterprise shines with an 8.9, offering more flexibility in managing different test types and environments, which is crucial for diverse testing needs.
- Users on G2 report that while both products have similar Ease of Use ratings at 7.8, Zephyr Enterprise is often described as more intuitive, particularly for new users, which can reduce the learning curve and improve team adoption rates.
- Reviewers mention that TestLink's Version Control feature, rated at 8.4, is effective but can be cumbersome, whereas Zephyr Enterprise, with a score of 8.8, is noted for its more streamlined version management, allowing teams to easily track changes and maintain test case integrity.
- Users say that TestLink's Customization options are somewhat limited, which can hinder teams looking for tailored solutions, while Zephyr Enterprise offers extensive customization features, enabling teams to adapt the software to their specific workflows and requirements.
Testlink helps us to create a testplan of the sprint before executing it, the created test plan can be linked to test requirements and to each test case, from the top search bar all test plans can be filtered at anytime, the pagination option allows user to...
1. For the first time use, and long after, it's not too intuitive in use 2. No option to link requirements with external systems (like JIRA) 3. No PDFed reports (also customizing reports could be extended) 4. I never liked the idea of Builds fixed to...
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
Testlink helps us to create a testplan of the sprint before executing it, the created test plan can be linked to test requirements and to each test case, from the top search bar all test plans can be filtered at anytime, the pagination option allows user to...
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
1. For the first time use, and long after, it's not too intuitive in use 2. No option to link requirements with external systems (like JIRA) 3. No PDFed reports (also customizing reports could be extended) 4. I never liked the idea of Builds fixed to...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
