Compare TestLink and TestRail 
- Users report that TestLink excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.7, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, TestRail, while still strong with a score of 8.9, is noted for its more user-friendly interface that enhances overall usability.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's ease of use is a significant advantage, with a score of 8.6 compared to TestLink's 7.8. This difference is often attributed to TestRail's intuitive design and streamlined workflows, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- G2 users highlight that TestLink's version control feature scores 8.4, which is beneficial for teams needing to track changes over time. However, TestRail's version control, with a score of 8.2, is perceived as less robust, leading some users to prefer TestLink for projects requiring meticulous version tracking.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail shines in its quality of support, scoring 8.4, which is higher than TestLink's 8.1. Many reviewers appreciate TestRail's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, which aids in quicker problem resolution.
- Reviewers mention that TestLink's integration capabilities score 7.8, which some users find limiting compared to TestRail's 7.9. However, TestRail is often praised for its seamless integration with popular tools like JIRA and Slack, enhancing collaboration across teams.
- Users say that while both products have strong reporting features, TestLink's reporting score of 8.5 is slightly higher than TestRail's 8.3. TestLink users appreciate the customizable reporting options that allow for tailored insights, although TestRail's reporting is still considered effective for most standard needs.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
Supports multiple projects. We can provide credentials to multiple users in an organization along with assigning them various roles and responsibilities. Test Cases can be assigned to multiple users as well.
Slow processing, Takes time to open each test case, Search capability is non-existent, After few years copy-move function does not works, 'X ray' an add on of JIRA is much capable, No import capabilities
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Supports multiple projects. We can provide credentials to multiple users in an organization along with assigning them various roles and responsibilities. Test Cases can be assigned to multiple users as well.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
Slow processing, Takes time to open each test case, Search capability is non-existent, After few years copy-move function does not works, 'X ray' an add on of JIRA is much capable, No import capabilities
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
