Compare Qase and TestRail 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases, while Qase shines even brighter with a score of 9.4, offering enhanced usability and flexibility in test case management.
- Reviewers mention that Qase's Quality of Support is notably high at 9.6, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas TestRail's support, rated at 8.4, is seen as adequate but not as robust.
- G2 users highlight that Qase's Ease of Setup is rated at 9.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick onboarding process, while TestRail, with a score of 8.5, may require more time to configure effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Qase's Test Diversity feature, rated at 9.0, allows for a broader range of testing types, which is particularly beneficial for teams with varied testing needs, compared to TestRail's score of 8.6 in the same category.
- Reviewers say that TestRail's Reporting capabilities, rated at 8.3, provide solid insights but lack some advanced analytics features that Qase offers, which is rated at 8.6 and includes more customizable reporting options that users find valuable.
- Users report that Qase's Product Direction, with a positive score of 9.6, indicates a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, while TestRail's score of 8.5 suggests a more stable but less innovative approach to product development.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
What I love most about QASE is that it is user-friendly and integrates exceptionally easily. Setting it up was easy, and soon became part of our daily operations we couldn’t do without. The test cases become easy to manage through the platforms intuitive...
The app has too many bugs, and it changes too often. It feels like using a beta version of the product. The amount of bugs and issues is way too big for the app that is created by and for testers.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
What I love most about QASE is that it is user-friendly and integrates exceptionally easily. Setting it up was easy, and soon became part of our daily operations we couldn’t do without. The test cases become easy to manage through the platforms intuitive...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
The app has too many bugs, and it changes too often. It feels like using a beta version of the product. The amount of bugs and issues is way too big for the app that is created by and for testers.
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
