Compare Adobe Captivate and Articulate 360 
- Users report that Adobe Captivate excels in content creation with a score of 8.5, allowing for a wide range of interactive eLearning experiences, while Articulate 360 shines with a higher score of 9.2, particularly noted for its user-friendly templates and intuitive design features.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Captivate's content libraries score 7.5, which some users find limiting compared to Articulate 360's score of 8.5, where users appreciate the extensive library of assets and resources that enhance course development.
- G2 users highlight that Adobe Captivate's ease of use is rated at 6.8, with some reviewers expressing frustration over its learning curve, whereas Articulate 360 boasts a score of 8.9, with many users praising its straightforward interface and quick onboarding process.
- Users on G2 report that Adobe Captivate's quality of support is rated at 6.9, with some users citing slow response times, while Articulate 360 receives a higher score of 9.0, with reviewers frequently mentioning responsive customer service and helpful resources.
- Reviewers say that Adobe Captivate's performance score of 7.8 is decent, but some users experience lag with complex projects, whereas Articulate 360's performance score of 9.0 is often praised for its smooth operation and reliability during course delivery.
- Users report that Adobe Captivate's integration APIs score 7.1, which some find limiting for advanced integrations, while Articulate 360's score of 7.4 is seen as more flexible, with users appreciating its compatibility with various LMS platforms and third-party tools.
- Everything included in the Articulate 360 Teams plan, plus AI Assistant, the premium option that lets you:
- Create blocks from prompts or source material
- Convert blocks from one type to another
Interactivity, buttons, smart shapes, question slides,
It’s overly complicated. Even basic course builds can be time consuming and the need to add navigation buttons to courses manually/build templates is a bit of a pain. Alternatives exist which just work better and quicker.
The range of tools available that can be matched to any digital learning requirement. Rise for rapid authoring, storyline for more complex and bespoke requirements. In addition to tools for screen recording etc.
Too few selections for what you can upload or link to; clunky main screen won't allow you to add content to already created courses (you can only add content to courses that have not yet been named/created); other issues involving fluidity. Moreover, it...
Interactivity, buttons, smart shapes, question slides,
The range of tools available that can be matched to any digital learning requirement. Rise for rapid authoring, storyline for more complex and bespoke requirements. In addition to tools for screen recording etc.
It’s overly complicated. Even basic course builds can be time consuming and the need to add navigation buttons to courses manually/build templates is a bit of a pain. Alternatives exist which just work better and quicker.
Too few selections for what you can upload or link to; clunky main screen won't allow you to add content to already created courses (you can only add content to courses that have not yet been named/created); other issues involving fluidity. Moreover, it...
