Compare TestRail and Xray Test Management 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring an impressive 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, Xray Test Management received a higher score of 9.4, indicating that users find its repository capabilities even more robust and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's integration capabilities scored 7.9, which some users find limiting when connecting with other tools. On the other hand, Xray Test Management scored 8.3, suggesting that it offers better integration options, making it easier for teams to connect with their existing workflows.
- G2 users highlight that TestRail's reporting functionality scored 8.3, but some users feel it could be more comprehensive. Conversely, Xray Test Management's reporting received a lower score of 7.8, indicating that while it may have fewer features, it is perceived as easier to use for generating reports.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail's version control feature scored 8.2, which is appreciated for tracking changes in test cases. However, Xray Test Management scored lower at 7.6, suggesting that users find its version control less effective or intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's ease of use is rated at 8.6, making it a favorable choice for teams looking for a straightforward interface. In comparison, Xray Test Management scored 8.0, indicating that while it is still user-friendly, it may require a bit more time for new users to adapt.
- Users say that TestRail's scaling capabilities scored 8.4, which is beneficial for growing teams. However, Xray Test Management outperformed with a score of 8.8, suggesting it is better suited for larger organizations or those anticipating rapid growth.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Xray allows testers to easily arrange their test cases into test sets for easy identification
It's a bit of a learning curve when getting started. It took our team about a year to realize that there are so many other tools to utilize, but didn't really understand how to get to that point. On top of that, Xray is different by JIRA account type, so...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
Xray allows testers to easily arrange their test cases into test sets for easy identification
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
It's a bit of a learning curve when getting started. It took our team about a year to realize that there are so many other tools to utilize, but didn't really understand how to get to that point. On top of that, Xray is different by JIRA account type, so...
