Compare TestMonitor and TestRail 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its test repository functionality, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, TestMonitor does not have a comparable score in this area, indicating a potential gap in test case management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that TestMonitor shines in ease of use, with a score of 9.6, making it particularly appealing for teams looking for a user-friendly interface. TestRail, while still strong at 8.6, may require a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight TestMonitor's superior quality of support, scoring 9.4, which is significantly higher than TestRail's 8.4. This suggests that TestMonitor may provide more responsive and helpful customer service, a critical factor for teams needing timely assistance.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail's integration capabilities score 7.9, which may limit its ability to connect seamlessly with other tools in a testing ecosystem. In contrast, TestMonitor's integration features are not explicitly rated but are often mentioned positively in user reviews, suggesting a more flexible approach to tool integration.
- Reviewers say that TestRail's reporting features score 8.3, which may not meet the needs of teams requiring advanced analytics. TestMonitor, while not rated in this specific area, is often praised for its intuitive reporting capabilities, indicating a potential advantage in generating actionable insights.
- Users report that TestRail's version control features score 8.2, which may not be as robust as needed for teams managing multiple test iterations. TestMonitor's version control is not specifically rated but is frequently mentioned as a strong point, suggesting it may offer better management of test versions.
- All our core features
- Integrated issue tracker
- Customizable reports
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
This comes in handy for testing my software very well.This app provides me excellent way to execute test cases,through which help is available in keeping a record of the shortcomings of the test case. In this tool we can track test case , view and share ...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
This comes in handy for testing my software very well.This app provides me excellent way to execute test cases,through which help is available in keeping a record of the shortcomings of the test case. In this tool we can track test case , view and share ...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
