Compare Episerver CMS and Umbraco 
- Users report that Umbraco excels in Ease of Use with a score of 8.8 compared to Optimizely's 7.9. Reviewers mention that Umbraco's intuitive interface makes it easier for content creators to navigate and manage their content effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Umbraco offers superior Content Scheduling capabilities, scoring 8.2 versus Optimizely's 7.9. Users appreciate the flexibility and control they have over when content goes live, which is crucial for marketing campaigns.
- G2 users highlight Umbraco's strong performance in Quality of Support, scoring 8.2 compared to Optimizely's 7.8. Reviewers say that Umbraco's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance when needed.
- Users on G2 report that Umbraco shines in Developer Tools, achieving a score of 8.8 against Optimizely's 7.3. Reviewers mention that Umbraco's robust API and integration capabilities make it a favorite among developers for custom solutions.
- Reviewers mention that Optimizely has a slight edge in Versioning with a score of 8.0 compared to Umbraco's 7.9. Users appreciate the ability to track changes and revert to previous versions, which is essential for maintaining content integrity.
- Users report that both platforms perform well in Content Performance, each scoring 8.0. However, reviewers say that Umbraco's analytics tools provide deeper insights into user engagement, helping businesses optimize their content strategy.
- Open Source CMS
- Web Content Management with Infinite editing
- Language Variants
What I love about the platform is that it does not reinvent the wheel - as a developer, you are free to leverage any of the newest and coolest frameworks and packages without much hassle. Yet, you have a support of a reliable system underneath.
This CMS absolutely requires an in-house .NET resource. Deploying aesthetic changes and creating new pages types is impossible without an employee that fully understands the .NET framework. Our company hired an agency to build our website using EPiServer....
by far my favorite feature is the backoffice. it's easier to customize the backoffice in Umbraco than it is in other CMS', which means you could build your own solution more readily, or customize the backoffice for your editors. the community is great, too,...
The CS4 file edit is good but not as great as Adobe PS or Canva. Too much of search results with low relevance to the search content. Need better UI/UX optimization.
What I love about the platform is that it does not reinvent the wheel - as a developer, you are free to leverage any of the newest and coolest frameworks and packages without much hassle. Yet, you have a support of a reliable system underneath.
by far my favorite feature is the backoffice. it's easier to customize the backoffice in Umbraco than it is in other CMS', which means you could build your own solution more readily, or customize the backoffice for your editors. the community is great, too,...
This CMS absolutely requires an in-house .NET resource. Deploying aesthetic changes and creating new pages types is impossible without an employee that fully understands the .NET framework. Our company hired an agency to build our website using EPiServer....
The CS4 file edit is good but not as great as Adobe PS or Canva. Too much of search results with low relevance to the search content. Need better UI/UX optimization.
