Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Tricentis qTest

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(67)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (52.2% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and facilitates better organization of testing assets. In contrast, Tricentis qTest, while still strong at 8.9, is noted for its user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation through test cases.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest shines in its Test Feedback feature, achieving a score of 9.2, which enhances collaboration among team members by allowing for detailed feedback on test results. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.3, provides solid feedback capabilities but lacks some of the intuitive features that qTest offers.
  • G2 users highlight the superior Test Variety in both products, with OpenText ALM Quality Center scoring 9.0 and Tricentis qTest at 9.2. However, users on G2 note that qTest's flexibility in accommodating various testing methodologies, such as exploratory testing, gives it an edge in diverse testing environments.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are robust, scoring 8.9, which allows for detailed insights into testing progress and outcomes. Conversely, Tricentis qTest, with a score of 8.2, is seen as less comprehensive in reporting, though it offers easier access to key metrics.
  • Users say that Tricentis qTest's Automation features are particularly strong, with a focus on seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to enhance their automation efforts. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering automation capabilities, does not match the level of integration and ease of use that qTest provides.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a more complex setup process, reflected in its lower Ease of Setup score of 7.2, which can be a barrier for new users. In contrast, Tricentis qTest is praised for its straightforward setup, scoring 7.9, making it more accessible for teams looking to get started quickly.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Tricentis qTest
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.4
53
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.2
54
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
7.9
24
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.1
18
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.2
51
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.4
19
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.9
62
Features by Category
8.9
11
8.4
20
Functionality
9.2
10
8.9
18
8.2
10
8.1
19
9.2
10
8.4
18
Management
8.8
10
8.2
19
8.8
10
8.7
17
8.8
10
8.3
17
8.7
13
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
6
9.0
10
Functionality
8.3
5
9.2
10
8.7
5
9.0
10
7.7
5
8.7
10
9.0
5
9.2
10
Automation
9.7
5
9.3
10
8.7
5
9.2
10
9.0
5
9.0
10
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
OpenText Application Quality Management and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Test Management, Software Testing, and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
11.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
52.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
35.8%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Information Technology and Services
32.8%
Computer Software
25.4%
Hospital & Health Care
6.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.5%
Other
25.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Krunal R.
KR
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics

It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Banking

nothing major to dislike. we use HP QC which is still not upto the mark in terms of user friendly and customization.

Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

The API allows us to be flexible in our testing strategy. We are able to easily aggregate results from several different sources to give a complete testing picture. This tool seems to have taken a more forward thinking approach vs other tools we evaluated...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

1.Available functionalities need to be enhanced such as report builders. 2.Bring in more APIs and improve the current ones. (APIs connecting different modules). 3.Store and run test scripts from qTest. 4.Maintain versions of test cases in case of...

Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
PractiTest
PractiTest
Add PractiTest
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Discussions
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options. See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more