- Home
- ...
- ALM Software
- codebeamer
- Jama Connect for Requirements Management
- codebeamer-vs-Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Compare Jama Connect for Requirements Management and codebeamer 
- Users report that codebeamer excels in its centralized information management, scoring 8.8 compared to Jama Connect's 9.0, which reviewers mention as a key feature for maintaining a single source of truth for requirements.
- Reviewers say that Jama Connect offers superior requirements listing capabilities with a score of 8.9, while codebeamer's score of 8.2 indicates that users find it less intuitive for organizing and managing requirements.
- G2 users highlight that both products have strong traceability features, but users on G2 mention that Jama Connect's traceability is slightly more robust, scoring 8.9 compared to codebeamer's 8.7, making it easier to track changes and relationships between requirements.
- Users say that codebeamer's automated creation and testing feature, with a score of 7.6, is beneficial but lacks the depth that some users find in Jama Connect, which scores 7.5, indicating that both products have room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Jama Connect shines in stakeholder communication, scoring 8.3, while codebeamer's score of 7.8 suggests that users find it less effective in facilitating communication among stakeholders.
- Users report that both products have a similar quality of support, with codebeamer scoring 8.3 and Jama Connect at 8.5, but reviewers mention that Jama Connect's support is often perceived as more responsive and helpful.
Captures requirements efficiently, pretty good requirements traceability options, baseline requirements easily, different views available, AGile ready, version tracking, test cases development, detailed workflows for estimation and manage project schedule.
It's not easy to search, it doesn't really correlate test cases to requirements that well. Can never figure out how to switch between related projects. And, if you want a report to come out of it, you can't. A PDF of test cases or requirements in a...
Eeasy to implement, very useful, useful in integration.
Things that could change are enabling a single click on the trackers, It will speed things up, making things easier to use. Another one is if there was the option in the Tracker hierarchy tree to open on the tracker in the same window rather than opening in...
Captures requirements efficiently, pretty good requirements traceability options, baseline requirements easily, different views available, AGile ready, version tracking, test cases development, detailed workflows for estimation and manage project schedule.
Eeasy to implement, very useful, useful in integration.
It's not easy to search, it doesn't really correlate test cases to requirements that well. Can never figure out how to switch between related projects. And, if you want a report to come out of it, you can't. A PDF of test cases or requirements in a...
Things that could change are enabling a single click on the trackers, It will speed things up, making things easier to use. Another one is if there was the option in the Tracker hierarchy tree to open on the tracker in the same window rather than opening in...
