Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Software Testing Tools
- IBM Engineering Test Management
- OpenText Application Quality Management
- IBM Engineering Test Management-vs-OpenText Application Quality Management
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and OpenText Application Quality Management 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
No pricing available
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for efficient management of test cases and easy access to historical data. In contrast, IBM Engineering Test Management, while strong, does not provide the same level of repository organization, leading to a slightly lower user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Test Management shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, making it more user-friendly for new teams. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.2, has been noted by users as having a steeper learning curve, which can delay initial project timelines.
- G2 users highlight the superior Bug Reporting features of OpenText ALM Quality Center, particularly in User Reports & Feedback, which scored 8.2. Users appreciate the detailed insights it provides, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management, with a score of 7.5 in Quality of Support, has received feedback indicating that its bug reporting could be more intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers robust Test Diversity with a score of 9.3, allowing teams to manage various testing types effectively. In comparison, IBM Engineering Test Management, while versatile, has been noted to lack some advanced customization options that users desire.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, providing comprehensive insights into testing progress and outcomes. Conversely, IBM Engineering Test Management, while functional, has received feedback indicating that its reporting features could be more user-friendly and visually appealing.
- Reviewers say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's organization and thoroughness in Administration, scoring 9.7 and 9.0 respectively, are standout features that help teams maintain clarity and control over their testing processes. IBM Engineering Test Management, while reliable, has been noted to have less emphasis on centralized information management, which can lead to some disorganization in larger projects.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Sahi Pro
(37)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
DocSheets
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Testiny
(14)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
8.2
118
Ease of Use
7.2
9
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
7.2
59
Quality of Support
7.5
8
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
IBM Engineering Test Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Steve W.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I liked the best is that you can manage your entire testing process directly within the tool. It gives you the capability to write your entire test plan, test cases, test scripts and import requirements from ReqPro all within the tool.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
The colors are very beautiful and I like to look at them
OpenText Application Quality Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Computer Software
UI is lacking. It is only available on Internet Explorer. Chrome/Firefox would be a better pick.
Steve W.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I liked the best is that you can manage your entire testing process directly within the tool. It gives you the capability to write your entire test plan, test cases, test scripts and import requirements from ReqPro all within the tool.
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
The colors are very beautiful and I like to look at them
Verified User in Computer Software
UI is lacking. It is only available on Internet Explorer. Chrome/Firefox would be a better pick.
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
