Compare Genymotion and MonkeyRunner 
- Users report that Genymotion excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.1, while MonkeyRunner trails slightly behind at 8.7, indicating that Genymotion may provide a more intuitive interface for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Genymotion's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.2, which is comparable to MonkeyRunner's 8.3, suggesting that both products offer solid support, but users may find Genymotion's support slightly less responsive.
- G2 users highlight Genymotion's "Test Variety" capabilities, allowing for a broader range of testing scenarios, while MonkeyRunner is noted for its "Automation" features, which some users find more robust for continuous integration workflows.
- Users on G2 report that Genymotion's "Deployment-Ready Staging" is a standout feature, making it easier to prepare applications for production, whereas MonkeyRunner is praised for its "Test Feedback" mechanism, which provides detailed insights into test results.
- Reviewers mention that Genymotion has a more extensive "Test History" feature, allowing users to track and manage previous test runs effectively, while MonkeyRunner's "Management Processes and Workflow" are seen as more streamlined for teams focused on automation.
- Users say that Genymotion's "Emulation" capabilities are superior, providing a more realistic testing environment, while MonkeyRunner is recognized for its flexibility in "Integration" with other tools, making it a preferred choice for users who require extensive toolchain compatibility.
- All inclusive
- Access to all Android versions
- Unlimited app installations
I have been using genymotion for more than three years now while developing android applications with android studio. Genymotion consumes less computer resources compared to other android virtual devices and also emulates most of device features. In the...
Poor performance for native application, not able to log into the google play.
Multiple control-the monkeyrunner API can apply one or more test suites across multiple devices or emulators. You can physically attach all devices or start up all the emulators (or both) at once, connect to each in turn programmatically, and then run one...
There's not much that I can dislike from monkeyrunner. This is particularly true, given that my usecase in this product is rather limited. One thing that I might find problem is when people need to test interaction within the app, it's quite hard to...
I have been using genymotion for more than three years now while developing android applications with android studio. Genymotion consumes less computer resources compared to other android virtual devices and also emulates most of device features. In the...
Multiple control-the monkeyrunner API can apply one or more test suites across multiple devices or emulators. You can physically attach all devices or start up all the emulators (or both) at once, connect to each in turn programmatically, and then run one...
Poor performance for native application, not able to log into the google play.
There's not much that I can dislike from monkeyrunner. This is particularly true, given that my usecase in this product is rather limited. One thing that I might find problem is when people need to test interaction within the app, it's quite hard to...
