Compare Conga CPQ and SAP CPQ 
- Users report that Conga CPQ excels in CRM Integration with a score of 9.0, while SAP CPQ trails behind at 8.3, indicating that Conga offers a more seamless experience when connecting with existing CRM systems.
- Reviewers mention that Conga CPQ's Workflow Management is highly rated at 8.5, providing users with efficient processes, whereas SAP CPQ's score of 6.9 suggests that users may face challenges in managing workflows effectively.
- G2 users highlight Conga CPQ's superior Internationalization capabilities, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for businesses operating in multiple regions, compared to SAP CPQ's score of 7.7, indicating a potential limitation for global operations.
- Users on G2 report that Conga CPQ's Document Admin features are robust, scoring 8.5, allowing for better management of documents, while SAP CPQ's score of 7.3 suggests that users may find it less user-friendly in this area.
- Reviewers say that Conga CPQ shines in Pricing Administration with a score of 8.3, making it easier for users to manage pricing strategies, while SAP CPQ's lower score of 6.9 indicates that users may struggle with pricing flexibility.
- Users report that Conga CPQ's Visual Configuration feature, scoring 7.7, is effective for users needing visual aids in product configuration, whereas SAP CPQ's higher score of 8.1 suggests it may offer a more intuitive visual configuration experience.
- Single Data Model: Built on a unified data architecture, Conga CPQ ensures consistent, synchronized data across your entire revenue lifecycle—from CRM to CLM and Billing—reducing errors and manual entry.
- Enterprise-Grade Complexity and Scalability: Conga CPQ is engineered to support global enterprise needs, handling advanced configurations, pricing scenarios, and quoting volumes with ease. It’s trusted by Fortune 500 companies to manage scale without compromise.
- Simplified Administration: Empower business users with low-code tools to manage product catalogs, rules, and pricing logic—eliminating IT bottlenecks and reducing administrative overhead.
100% native Force,com; fully integrated solution; easily customizable through Force.com; flexible on subscription terms and pricing; a very helpful and friendly and accommodating Sales and Professional Services team
Not able to write extremely complex rules without customization. Some out of the box features like renewals, ramps cannot be customized without significant customization. Cannot make the tool look the way we want without custom code - UI needs to be...
Compared to most systems, the back end of Callidus has proved to be easy to configure without coding. Additionally, only half of our team use CRM and so the web portal login without CRM reliance is a great time saver.
There are many thing. Essentially, the templates are all completely bespoke, so re-use is incredibly limited. From an administrative perspective, there was way too much overhead unless you literally are just doing the same exact terms and conditions each...
100% native Force,com; fully integrated solution; easily customizable through Force.com; flexible on subscription terms and pricing; a very helpful and friendly and accommodating Sales and Professional Services team
Compared to most systems, the back end of Callidus has proved to be easy to configure without coding. Additionally, only half of our team use CRM and so the web portal login without CRM reliance is a great time saver.
Not able to write extremely complex rules without customization. Some out of the box features like renewals, ramps cannot be customized without significant customization. Cannot make the tool look the way we want without custom code - UI needs to be...
There are many thing. Essentially, the templates are all completely bespoke, so re-use is incredibly limited. From an administrative perspective, there was way too much overhead unless you literally are just doing the same exact terms and conditions each...
