Compare Common Room and Pocus 
- Users report that Common Room excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.5, while Pocus, with a score of 9.2, is still strong but slightly less responsive. Reviewers mention that Common Room's support team is highly knowledgeable and quick to resolve issues.
- Reviewers mention that Common Room offers superior Contact Data Availability (8.9) compared to Pocus (7.3). Users say that the comprehensive contact data provided by Common Room allows for more effective outreach and engagement strategies.
- Users on G2 highlight that Common Room's Lead Qualification feature scores 8.7, outperforming Pocus's 7.9. Reviewers say that the lead scoring algorithms in Common Room are more accurate, helping teams prioritize high-quality leads effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Pocus shines in Meeting Scheduling with a score of 6.1, compared to Common Room's 5.3. Users report that Pocus's scheduling tool is more intuitive and integrates seamlessly with their calendars.
- Users say that Common Room's Ease of Setup (8.0) is slightly lower than Pocus's (8.3), but they appreciate the detailed onboarding process provided by Common Room, which helps users get up to speed quickly.
- G2 users report that both products have the same score for Product Direction (9.7), indicating that both companies are committed to continuous improvement and innovation, but reviewers mention that Common Room has a more transparent roadmap.
- Up to 35k contacts
- Up to 2 seats
- Select integrations (add on others)
The aggregation of all of our signals into one dashboard is the most useful part of Common Room. My team is able to cross coordinate across various platforms to target the right contacts at the right time.
Our CRM doesn't map to their database, making it difficult to use all features and understand which company in our CRM their insights are applicable to. Because of this, implementation took about 6 months and we still have obstacles to work around.
There are many positives. Pocus saves us so much time, and has played a major role in helping us create clear ROI for PLG at QuickNode. We use Pocus daily, and couldn't operationalize our stack without it. The team is also top notch and always there to...
I am not necessarily a power user, but I struggle with the breakdown of the lists vs playbooks. Additionally, I wish I could email right from pocus as opposed to getting routed back into gmail
The aggregation of all of our signals into one dashboard is the most useful part of Common Room. My team is able to cross coordinate across various platforms to target the right contacts at the right time.
There are many positives. Pocus saves us so much time, and has played a major role in helping us create clear ROI for PLG at QuickNode. We use Pocus daily, and couldn't operationalize our stack without it. The team is also top notch and always there to...
Our CRM doesn't map to their database, making it difficult to use all features and understand which company in our CRM their insights are applicable to. Because of this, implementation took about 6 months and we still have obstacles to work around.
I am not necessarily a power user, but I struggle with the breakdown of the lists vs playbooks. Additionally, I wish I could email right from pocus as opposed to getting routed back into gmail
