Compare BetterContact and FullEnrich 
- Users report that BetterContact excels in its Lead Builder feature, scoring 9.3, which allows for efficient lead generation tailored to small businesses, while FullEnrich's Lead Builder scored lower at 8.9, indicating a less robust offering in this area.
- Reviewers mention that BetterContact's CRM Integration is rated at 8.7, providing seamless connectivity with popular CRM systems, whereas FullEnrich's integration scored lower at 7.9, suggesting potential challenges in syncing data effectively.
- G2 users highlight that BetterContact's Data Import & Export Tools received a high score of 9.4, making it easier for users to manage their data, while FullEnrich's tools, although still strong at 9.3, may not offer the same level of user-friendliness.
- Users on G2 appreciate BetterContact's Lead Enrichment feature, which scored 9.7, as it provides comprehensive insights into leads, whereas FullEnrich's Lead Enrichment scored 9.5, indicating it may not be as thorough in enriching lead data.
- Reviewers say that BetterContact's Browser Extension is a standout feature, enhancing user experience by allowing quick access to lead information, while FullEnrich does not have a comparable browser extension, which may limit its usability for some users.
- Users report that both products have a strong Quality of Support, with BetterContact and FullEnrich both scoring 9.6, but BetterContact's overall ease of use and setup scores suggest a more user-friendly experience, making it a preferred choice for small businesses.
- All features
It is reliable in finding email addresses when other providers did not find any! It is also very intuitive to use and the data gathered are easy to interpret and use as well.
there are bugs, you can not cancel the process when it beginns and the support is like shit
A much more reliable approach to enrichment. Cascading enrichment enables us to ensure the reliability of data on larger volumes than with our previous processes. We were missing this ++ quality part on tel numbers!
UX is slow and clunky. Chrome extension needs some work as well. Overall their process is very slow. Their support is doesnt exist at this point.
It is reliable in finding email addresses when other providers did not find any! It is also very intuitive to use and the data gathered are easy to interpret and use as well.
A much more reliable approach to enrichment. Cascading enrichment enables us to ensure the reliability of data on larger volumes than with our previous processes. We were missing this ++ quality part on tel numbers!
there are bugs, you can not cancel the process when it beginns and the support is like shit
UX is slow and clunky. Chrome extension needs some work as well. Overall their process is very slow. Their support is doesnt exist at this point.
