Compare Applitools and BrowserStack 
- Users report that Applitools excels in Visual Testing, with its Overlay Engine receiving high praise for its ability to detect visual bugs that other tools might miss, making it a preferred choice for teams focused on UI consistency.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack shines in Cross-Browser Testing, particularly with its extensive range of real devices and browsers, allowing for comprehensive testing across different environments, which is crucial for web applications.
- G2 users highlight that Applitools offers superior Quality Assurance Dashboard features, providing actionable insights and a clear overview of testing results, which helps teams quickly identify and address issues.
- Users on G2 report that BrowserStack's Real-Time Monitoring capabilities are robust, enabling teams to track performance and issues as they occur, which is essential for maintaining application reliability during development.
- Reviewers say that Applitools' Automated Regression Testing is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor their testing processes to fit specific project needs, which enhances overall testing efficiency.
- Users report that BrowserStack's Version Control feature is particularly beneficial for teams working in agile environments, as it allows for seamless integration and management of different test versions, ensuring that the latest updates are always tested.
- CI/CD integration
- 3 users
- 3 concurrent sessions
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
The shallow learning curve for initially implementing it. Typically QAs have less experience working with code and less time to learn. this can make starting a proof of concept or just integrating a plugin into an existinging framework prohibitively...
Bugs and unexplained behaviour. When we had problems with thee Testim integrartion the solutions were sometimes to add steps that were unclear to us.
A great tool for evaluation a website's responsiveness is BrowserStack and provide best customer services. It gives you the option to select from a variety of devices to test how your website works on various screen sizes and guarantees that its...
It is a pain sometimes to use the product because of how laggy it is and clunky it is. It is quite slow and takes a lot of loading time. Also, accessibility is not available in iPhone and is only available in andorid or desktop. The local testing is good...
The shallow learning curve for initially implementing it. Typically QAs have less experience working with code and less time to learn. this can make starting a proof of concept or just integrating a plugin into an existinging framework prohibitively...
A great tool for evaluation a website's responsiveness is BrowserStack and provide best customer services. It gives you the option to select from a variety of devices to test how your website works on various screen sizes and guarantees that its...
Bugs and unexplained behaviour. When we had problems with thee Testim integrartion the solutions were sometimes to add steps that were unclear to us.
It is a pain sometimes to use the product because of how laggy it is and clunky it is. It is quite slow and takes a lot of loading time. Also, accessibility is not available in iPhone and is only available in andorid or desktop. The local testing is good...
