- Home
- ...
- Transactional Email Software
- ActiveCampaign Postmark
- MailerSend
- ActiveCampaign Postmark-vs-MailerSend
Compare ActiveCampaign Postmark and MailerSend 
- Users report that ActiveCampaign excels in its Ease of Use with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a user-friendly interface, while MailerSend, with a score of 8.8, is noted to have a slightly steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that ActiveCampaign's Email Segmentation feature, scoring 7.7, is less robust compared to MailerSend's 8.3, which offers more advanced options for targeting specific customer segments effectively.
- G2 users highlight that ActiveCampaign's Template Creation feature, rated at 8.0, could benefit from more preset templates, whereas MailerSend shines with a score of 8.5, providing a wider variety of customizable templates for users.
- Users on G2 report that ActiveCampaign's Notifications feature, scoring 9.3, is highly praised for its reliability, while MailerSend's score of 8.6 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers say that ActiveCampaign's Documentation is rated at 9.1, making it easier for users to find help and resources, while MailerSend's documentation, with a score of 8.9, is considered slightly less comprehensive.
- Users report that both platforms perform well in Performance and Reliability, but ActiveCampaign's score of 9.1 is slightly lower than MailerSend's 9.3, indicating that MailerSend may offer a more stable experience during high-volume email campaigns.
- 100 emails per month
- Email API
- Bulk emailing
- 1000 Daily API requests
The focus on transactional-only email and high deliverability is awesome; most small senders don't have the volume to justify the dedicated IPs every other transactional email provider seems to be pushing. The UI is nice. Documentation is good and API is...
The price is too high for what we get. Also their administration panel and Analytics graphs are not user friendly.
They offer a free tier for small businesses, with remarkable support
This exact investment of using the features has become meaningless because this particular work was updated with forced elements onto it and I have no optional control over it. Especially when the promise was that it won't have any forced elements on it....
The focus on transactional-only email and high deliverability is awesome; most small senders don't have the volume to justify the dedicated IPs every other transactional email provider seems to be pushing. The UI is nice. Documentation is good and API is...
They offer a free tier for small businesses, with remarkable support
The price is too high for what we get. Also their administration panel and Analytics graphs are not user friendly.
This exact investment of using the features has become meaningless because this particular work was updated with forced elements onto it and I have no optional control over it. Especially when the promise was that it won't have any forced elements on it....
