Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Best Component Libraries Software for Small Business

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello

Products classified in the overall Component Libraries category are similar in many regards and help companies of all sizes solve their business problems. However, small business features, pricing, setup, and installation differ from businesses of other sizes, which is why we match buyers to the right Small Business Component Libraries to fit their needs. Compare product ratings based on reviews from enterprise users or connect with one of G2's buying advisors to find the right solutions within the Small Business Component Libraries category.

In addition to qualifying for inclusion in the Component Libraries Software category, to qualify for inclusion in the Small Business Component Libraries Software category, a product must have at least 10 reviews left by a reviewer from a small business.

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

  • Small-Business
  • Rating
  • Language
  • Pricing
  • Component Libraries
1 filter applied
Clear All
  • Small-Business
  • Rating
  • Language
  • Pricing
  • Component Libraries
Clear Filter
More Filters
Market Segments
All Segments
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
Avg. Customer Review
Language
Pricing
Component Libraries
Sort by
Clear All

17 Listings in Small Business Component Libraries Available

  • Sort By:
    G2 Score
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
(608)4.5 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Syncfusion® Essential Studio® is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible, optimized for

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Software Developer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 82% Small-Business
    • 13% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Syncfusion Essential Studio® Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    62
    Customer Support
    59
    Features
    59
    Components
    56
    Documentation
    42
    Cons
    Poor Documentation
    29
    Confusing Documentation
    20
    Documentation Issues
    18
    Update Issues
    16
    Complex Customization
    14
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Syncfusion Essential Studio® features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.1
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.9
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Syncfusion®
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2001
    HQ Location
    Morrisville, North Carolina
    Twitter
    @Syncfusion
    12,048 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    2,244 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Syncfusion® Essential Studio® is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible, optimized for

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Software Developer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 82% Small-Business
  • 13% Mid-Market
Syncfusion Essential Studio® Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
62
Customer Support
59
Features
59
Components
56
Documentation
42
Cons
Poor Documentation
29
Confusing Documentation
20
Documentation Issues
18
Update Issues
16
Complex Customization
14
Syncfusion Essential Studio® features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.1
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.9
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Syncfusion®
Company Website
Year Founded
2001
HQ Location
Morrisville, North Carolina
Twitter
@Syncfusion
12,048 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
2,244 employees on LinkedIn®
Progress Telerik
(145)4.5 out of 5
7th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Starting at $849.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    With Telerik and Kendo UI libraries, Progress equips .NET and JavaScript developers with a full arsenal of components, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and int

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Software Developer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 50% Small-Business
    • 25% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Progress Telerik Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    27
    Functionality
    23
    Customer Support
    21
    Components
    20
    Features
    19
    Cons
    Learning Curve
    8
    Missing Features
    7
    Steep Learning Curve
    7
    Cost Issues
    6
    Expensive
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Progress Telerik features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.5
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.1
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.5
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Progress Software
    Year Founded
    1981
    HQ Location
    Burlington, MA.
    Twitter
    @ProgressSW
    49,667 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    3,769 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:PRGS
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

With Telerik and Kendo UI libraries, Progress equips .NET and JavaScript developers with a full arsenal of components, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and int

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Software Developer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 50% Small-Business
  • 25% Mid-Market
Progress Telerik Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
27
Functionality
23
Customer Support
21
Components
20
Features
19
Cons
Learning Curve
8
Missing Features
7
Steep Learning Curve
7
Cost Issues
6
Expensive
6
Progress Telerik features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.5
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.1
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.5
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Progress Software
Year Founded
1981
HQ Location
Burlington, MA.
Twitter
@ProgressSW
49,667 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
3,769 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:PRGS
Read Progress Telerik Reviews

G2 Deals

Buying software just got smarter. And cheaper.

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
See Exclusive Offers
DevExpress
(115)4.8 out of 5
2nd Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    DevExpress engineers feature-complete Presentation Controls, IDE Productivity Tools, Business Application Frameworks, and Reporting / Dashboard Systems for Visual Studio, Delphi, HTML5 or iOS & An

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 70% Small-Business
    • 16% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • DevExpress Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    41
    Features
    25
    Product Quality
    22
    Ease of Use
    20
    Components
    17
    Cons
    Learning Curve
    11
    Missing Features
    9
    Difficulty
    8
    Learning Difficulty
    6
    Limited Features
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • DevExpress features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    10.0
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.7
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    DevExpress
    Year Founded
    1998
    HQ Location
    Glendale, CA
    Twitter
    @DevExpress
    8,599 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    195 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

DevExpress engineers feature-complete Presentation Controls, IDE Productivity Tools, Business Application Frameworks, and Reporting / Dashboard Systems for Visual Studio, Delphi, HTML5 or iOS & An

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 70% Small-Business
  • 16% Mid-Market
DevExpress Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
41
Features
25
Product Quality
22
Ease of Use
20
Components
17
Cons
Learning Curve
11
Missing Features
9
Difficulty
8
Learning Difficulty
6
Limited Features
6
DevExpress features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
10.0
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.7
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
DevExpress
Year Founded
1998
HQ Location
Glendale, CA
Twitter
@DevExpress
8,599 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
195 employees on LinkedIn®
Read DevExpress Reviews
Progress Kendo UI
(241)4.4 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
9th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Starting at $899.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Progress Telerik and Kendo UI provide the finest software development tools collection for any platform and technology. Kendo UI is a bundle of four JavaScript UI libraries built natively for jQuery,

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Software Developer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 37% Enterprise
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Progress Kendo UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    15
    Components
    13
    Features
    12
    Controls
    11
    Ease of Use
    11
    Cons
    Poor Documentation
    6
    Complex Customization
    4
    Customization Difficulty
    4
    Performance Issues
    4
    Confusing Documentation
    3
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Progress Kendo UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.5
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.2
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.1
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Progress Software
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    1981
    HQ Location
    Burlington, MA.
    Twitter
    @ProgressSW
    49,667 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    3,769 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Progress Telerik and Kendo UI provide the finest software development tools collection for any platform and technology. Kendo UI is a bundle of four JavaScript UI libraries built natively for jQuery,

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Software Developer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 37% Enterprise
  • 33% Mid-Market
Progress Kendo UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
15
Components
13
Features
12
Controls
11
Ease of Use
11
Cons
Poor Documentation
6
Complex Customization
4
Customization Difficulty
4
Performance Issues
4
Confusing Documentation
3
Progress Kendo UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.5
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.2
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.1
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Progress Software
Company Website
Year Founded
1981
HQ Location
Burlington, MA.
Twitter
@ProgressSW
49,667 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
3,769 employees on LinkedIn®
Flutter
(65)4.6 out of 5
View top Consulting Services for Flutter
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Flutter allows you to build beautiful native apps on iOS and Android from a single codebase.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 72% Small-Business
    • 23% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Flutter Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Cross-Platform Compatibility
    2
    Ease of Learning
    1
    Ease of Understanding
    1
    Ease of Use
    1
    Feature Rich
    1
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    2
    Compatibility Issues
    1
    Library Size
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Flutter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.9
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Flutter
    Year Founded
    2017
    HQ Location
    Mountain View, US
    Twitter
    @flutter
    2,036 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    197 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Flutter allows you to build beautiful native apps on iOS and Android from a single codebase.

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 72% Small-Business
  • 23% Mid-Market
Flutter Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cross-Platform Compatibility
2
Ease of Learning
1
Ease of Understanding
1
Ease of Use
1
Feature Rich
1
Cons
Performance Issues
2
Compatibility Issues
1
Library Size
1
Flutter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.9
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Flutter
Year Founded
2017
HQ Location
Mountain View, US
Twitter
@flutter
2,036 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
197 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Flutter Reviews
Appsmith
(65)4.7 out of 5
8th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Appsmith is an open-source low-code application platform that simplifies custom application development for businesses, allowing them to streamline operations, automate processes, quickly integrate mu

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 66% Small-Business
    • 25% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Appsmith Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    57
    Time-saving
    25
    Features
    24
    Easy Integrations
    23
    User Interface
    23
    Cons
    Limited Features
    26
    Missing Features
    16
    Lack of Features
    15
    Poor UI Design
    12
    Limited Customization
    10
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Appsmith features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.2
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Appsmith
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2019
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, US
    Twitter
    @theappsmith
    3,821 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    in.linkedin.com
    95 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Appsmith is an open-source low-code application platform that simplifies custom application development for businesses, allowing them to streamline operations, automate processes, quickly integrate mu

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 66% Small-Business
  • 25% Mid-Market
Appsmith Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
57
Time-saving
25
Features
24
Easy Integrations
23
User Interface
23
Cons
Limited Features
26
Missing Features
16
Lack of Features
15
Poor UI Design
12
Limited Customization
10
Appsmith features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.2
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Appsmith
Company Website
Year Founded
2019
HQ Location
San Francisco, US
Twitter
@theappsmith
3,821 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
in.linkedin.com
95 employees on LinkedIn®
DHTMLX UI
(46)4.7 out of 5
3rd Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    DHTMLX delivers multifunctional JavaScript libraries and UI widgets for developing modern enterprise and B2B web applications of any scale from scratch. Using these out-of-the-box components, web deve

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 78% Small-Business
    • 20% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • DHTMLX UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Components
    3
    Support Speed
    2
    Automation
    1
    Customer Support
    1
    Documentation
    1
    Cons
    This product has not yet received any negative sentiments.
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • DHTMLX UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.3
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    DHTMLX
    Year Founded
    2005
    HQ Location
    Warsaw, PL
    Twitter
    @dhtmlx
    757 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    8 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

DHTMLX delivers multifunctional JavaScript libraries and UI widgets for developing modern enterprise and B2B web applications of any scale from scratch. Using these out-of-the-box components, web deve

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 78% Small-Business
  • 20% Mid-Market
DHTMLX UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Components
3
Support Speed
2
Automation
1
Customer Support
1
Documentation
1
Cons
This product has not yet received any negative sentiments.
DHTMLX UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.3
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.8
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
DHTMLX
Year Founded
2005
HQ Location
Warsaw, PL
Twitter
@dhtmlx
757 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
8 employees on LinkedIn®
Read DHTMLX UI Reviews
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
(153)4.4 out of 5
6th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Ionic is the leading mobile app development platform for web developers, powering over 15% of the world’s apps and used by hundreds of Fortune 1000 companies for consumer and internal facing apps. Io

    Users
    • Senior Software Engineer
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 73% Small-Business
    • 18% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Ionic: An OutSystems Company Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    4
    Implementation Ease
    3
    App Development
    2
    Code Editing
    2
    Customer Support
    2
    Cons
    Dependency Issues
    2
    Bug Issues
    1
    Code Management
    1
    Complexity
    1
    Connectivity Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Ionic: An OutSystems Company features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.4
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Ionic
    Year Founded
    2012
    HQ Location
    Madison, WI
    Twitter
    @Ionicframework
    118,142 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    57 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Ionic is the leading mobile app development platform for web developers, powering over 15% of the world’s apps and used by hundreds of Fortune 1000 companies for consumer and internal facing apps. Io

Users
  • Senior Software Engineer
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 73% Small-Business
  • 18% Mid-Market
Ionic: An OutSystems Company Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
4
Implementation Ease
3
App Development
2
Code Editing
2
Customer Support
2
Cons
Dependency Issues
2
Bug Issues
1
Code Management
1
Complexity
1
Connectivity Issues
1
Ionic: An OutSystems Company features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.4
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Ionic
Year Founded
2012
HQ Location
Madison, WI
Twitter
@Ionicframework
118,142 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
57 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Ionic: An OutSystems Company Reviews
Qt
(52)4.3 out of 5
10th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Read more about our product here: https://www.qt.io/product Programming should be fast, easy and fun. That’s why we have been focusing on improving software development for the last 25 years, and wit

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 50% Small-Business
    • 31% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Qt features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    10.0
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.2
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.3
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Qt Group
    Year Founded
    1995
    HQ Location
    Espoo, Finland
    Twitter
    @qtproject
    21,832 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    22 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Read more about our product here: https://www.qt.io/product Programming should be fast, easy and fun. That’s why we have been focusing on improving software development for the last 25 years, and wit

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 50% Small-Business
  • 31% Mid-Market
Qt features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
10.0
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.2
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.3
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Qt Group
Year Founded
1995
HQ Location
Espoo, Finland
Twitter
@qtproject
21,832 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
22 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Qt Reviews
Angular Material
(51)4.4 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. Finely tuned performance, because every millisecond counts. Fully tested across modern bro

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 39% Mid-Market
    • 37% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Angular Material Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Easy Integrations
    1
    Integrations
    1
    Responsive Design
    1
    Cons
    Library Size
    1
    Poor UI Design
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Angular Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.2
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Angular Material
    Year Founded
    2014
    HQ Location
    Melbourne, Vic
    Twitter
    @angular
    488,624 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    4 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. Finely tuned performance, because every millisecond counts. Fully tested across modern bro

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 39% Mid-Market
  • 37% Small-Business
Angular Material Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Easy Integrations
1
Integrations
1
Responsive Design
1
Cons
Library Size
1
Poor UI Design
1
Angular Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.2
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Angular Material
Year Founded
2014
HQ Location
Melbourne, Vic
Twitter
@angular
488,624 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
4 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Angular Material Reviews
pandas python
(93)4.6 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    pandas is an open source, BSD-licensed library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools for the Python programming language.

    Users
    • Data Scientist
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 39% Enterprise
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • pandas python Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Management
    1
    Design Quality
    1
    Ease of Understanding
    1
    Ease of Use
    1
    Easy Integrations
    1
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    1
    Understanding Difficulty
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • pandas python features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.5
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.2
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.1
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    pandas python
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @pypi
    21,533 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

pandas is an open source, BSD-licensed library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools for the Python programming language.

Users
  • Data Scientist
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 39% Enterprise
  • 33% Mid-Market
pandas python Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Management
1
Design Quality
1
Ease of Understanding
1
Ease of Use
1
Easy Integrations
1
Cons
Performance Issues
1
Understanding Difficulty
1
pandas python features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.2
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.1
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
pandas python
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@pypi
21,533 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1 employees on LinkedIn®
Read pandas python Reviews
Material UI
(30)4.5 out of 5
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 47% Small-Business
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Material UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Components
    8
    UI Components
    8
    Customizability
    7
    User Interface
    7
    Customization Options
    6
    Cons
    Customization Difficulty
    5
    Limited Customization
    4
    Integration Issues
    3
    Confusing Documentation
    2
    Learning Difficulty
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Material UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    10.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.4
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    7.8
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    MUI
    Year Founded
    2019
    HQ Location
    Paris, TF
    Twitter
    @MUI_hq
    18,963 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    64 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 47% Small-Business
  • 33% Mid-Market
Material UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Components
8
UI Components
8
Customizability
7
User Interface
7
Customization Options
6
Cons
Customization Difficulty
5
Limited Customization
4
Integration Issues
3
Confusing Documentation
2
Learning Difficulty
2
Material UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
10.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.9
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.4
Component Library
Average: 8.9
7.8
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
MUI
Year Founded
2019
HQ Location
Paris, TF
Twitter
@MUI_hq
18,963 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
64 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Material UI Reviews
Leaflet.js
(29)4.6 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Leaflet is the leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. Weighing just about 38 KB of JS, it has all the mapping features most developers ever need.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 72% Small-Business
    • 14% Enterprise
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Leaflet.js features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    7.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.9
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    It's open source...
    Year Founded
    1999
    HQ Location
    Copenhagen
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    42 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Leaflet is the leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. Weighing just about 38 KB of JS, it has all the mapping features most developers ever need.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 72% Small-Business
  • 14% Enterprise
Leaflet.js features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.9
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
7.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.9
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
It's open source...
Year Founded
1999
HQ Location
Copenhagen
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
42 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Leaflet.js Reviews
Selenium WebDriver
(92)4.5 out of 5
4th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Selenium is an umbrella project encapsulating a variety of tools and libraries enabling web browser automation. Selenium specifically provides infrastructure for the W3C WebDriver specification - a pl

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 47% Enterprise
    • 37% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Language Support
    5
    Automation
    4
    Browser Compatibility
    4
    Ease of Understanding
    3
    Ease of Use
    3
    Cons
    Lack of Automation
    4
    Compatibility Issues
    3
    Integration Issues
    3
    Complexity
    1
    Difficulty
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Selenium WebDriver features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.5
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Selenium
    Year Founded
    2004
    HQ Location
    Chicago, IL
    Twitter
    @SeleniumHQ
    24,021 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    107 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Selenium is an umbrella project encapsulating a variety of tools and libraries enabling web browser automation. Selenium specifically provides infrastructure for the W3C WebDriver specification - a pl

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 47% Enterprise
  • 37% Mid-Market
Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Language Support
5
Automation
4
Browser Compatibility
4
Ease of Understanding
3
Ease of Use
3
Cons
Lack of Automation
4
Compatibility Issues
3
Integration Issues
3
Complexity
1
Difficulty
1
Selenium WebDriver features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.5
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Selenium
Year Founded
2004
HQ Location
Chicago, IL
Twitter
@SeleniumHQ
24,021 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
107 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Selenium WebDriver Reviews
pygame
(34)4.4 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    pygame (the library) is a Free and Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications like games built on top of the excellent SDL library.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Games
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 88% Small-Business
    • 9% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • pygame features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    6.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    7.7
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    pygame
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @pygame
    49 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

pygame (the library) is a Free and Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications like games built on top of the excellent SDL library.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Games
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 88% Small-Business
  • 9% Mid-Market
pygame features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
6.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.9
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
7.7
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
pygame
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@pygame
49 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1 employees on LinkedIn®
Read pygame Reviews
python sql
(40)4.1 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    python-sql is a library to write SQL queries in a pythonic way.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Internet
    Market Segment
    • 45% Mid-Market
    • 35% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
    • python sql Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    1
    User Interface
    1
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • python sql features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    6.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.8
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.4
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.9
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    python sql
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @pypi
    21,533 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

python-sql is a library to write SQL queries in a pythonic way.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Internet
Market Segment
  • 45% Mid-Market
  • 35% Small-Business
python sql Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
1
User Interface
1
Cons
Performance Issues
1
python sql features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
6.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.8
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.4
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.9
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
python sql
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@pypi
21,533 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1 employees on LinkedIn®
Read python sql Reviews
Bunifu Framework
(17)4.8 out of 5
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:$49.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
    • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Bunifu Framework helps software developers and companies globally create modern, stunning software interfaces and user experience The product supports WinForms for C# and VB.NET developers. The featu

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 71% Small-Business
    • 24% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
    • Bunifu Framework features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.7
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
    • Seller Details
    Seller
    Bunifu Technologies
    Year Founded
    2011
    HQ Location
    Nairobi, KE
    Twitter
    @Bunifu
    1,626 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    21 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Bunifu Framework helps software developers and companies globally create modern, stunning software interfaces and user experience The product supports WinForms for C# and VB.NET developers. The featu

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 71% Small-Business
  • 24% Mid-Market
Bunifu Framework features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.7
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.8
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Bunifu Technologies
Year Founded
2011
HQ Location
Nairobi, KE
Twitter
@Bunifu
1,626 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
21 employees on LinkedIn®
Read Bunifu Framework Reviews
Filters
Filter
Clear Filter
More Filters
Market Segments
All Segments
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
Avg. Customer Review
Language
Pricing
Component Libraries
Sort by
Clear All
  • Small-Business
Clear Filter
More Filters
Market Segments
All Segments
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
Avg. Customer Review
Language
Pricing
Component Libraries
Sort by
Clear All

17 Listings in Small Business Component Libraries Available

  • Sort By:
    G2 Score

Recommended For You

SAS Viya
Tray.ai
Apache Kafka
Confluent
IBM StreamSets