Full Cycle Development Software

I think Polarion lacks a little in the exporting area. Specifically to be able to export the information that I want in a specific format. The great thing about the previous requirement tool we used was that we could export the information we had in any table format we wanted to excel.

It is sort of possible to do it in Polarion, create an export template for work items and using that. The issue is that it doesn't export the information I want when it has linked work items. I would really want to be able to export a work item with the corresponding linked work items, AND certain fields of those linked work items. Not just a table column with the linked work items.

Another thing in the same area is the filtering in the tracker view. The lucene filtering works but when I want to look at specific linked work items it sort of fails, I can us SQL queries but that is a bit much work since Polarion has like 1000 tables in the database. For example, I want to show all the test work items with a specific field that is linked to a parent work item: "id:TT-47 AND linkedWorkItem.role:verifiedBy AND linkedWorkItem.field.integrityLevel:asilD". Like that.

There is also a thing when wanting to move a work item. When in the tracker view moving an item into a document is trivial. But when I am working in a liveDoc i can't move an item, I have to open the item and then use the move function. I would like the function to be available when I work inside the document.

I also think the function to move a liveReport doesn't exist, it is only possible to move a liveDoc. At least i haven't found a way to move a liveReport yet.

Another feature that would be really nice to have is the ability to create Versions of an work item. Not just using the revision number, but actual versioning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Polarion solves the issue we have with tracking and traceability of requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When logging in for the first time it take a bit longer to open compared to other time logins, and also if we open several cases at once it starts to lag and gets slow by the time. If there was a app to do offline work that would have been great too for doing simple tasks like to add comments or create tasks or even creat requirements etc, that that would be great too. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its been great for the small teams and single users as the workflow enables us to start small without implementingd a full methodology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Code Beamer is not user friendly in terms of use.It is bit complex to navigate and modify. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Codebeamer solving requirement management which are done previously in excel,but that is not real time interface.Codebeamer provides its use more open to all Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The inability to create views with multi level tracing. Being forced to go to the RS to create these views is cumbersome. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is giving us strong tracability and document publishing capability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration with third party tool can sometimes be challenging Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helps in tracing the requirements to the test cases thereby improving the test coverage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

According to me Spiratest is a good tool, and I don't have anying that I disliked about SpiraTest. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using spira has enabled us to work as a team seamlessly, it helps us distribute work effectively and stay organized when it comes to understanding requirements and meeting

expectations. Manageing and getting back followups from the team regularly has become so much more simpler, this helps us dedicate our

time and energy entirely towards productivity eliminating any levay in manageing and asking for followups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are not many issues with SpiraTeam.Some user feel the interface could be more intuitive, but overall, it works well without major complaints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SpiraTeam helps teams stay on the same page by putting all project information in one place. This makes it easier to fix problems quickly and keeps work moving smoothly, as everyone is using the same system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qt's licensing model is a bit restrictive. While it offers a commercial license for proprietary applications, the open-source version (LGPL) requires dynamic linking, which may impose limitations on certain types of projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It makes it very quick to build professional cross platform desktop applications allowing us to ship new products at a fast pace and with a lot of tools usable out of the box. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helix ALM is a premium tool, and licensing costs can add up, especially for larger teams.

It may not be the best option for companies looking for budget-friendly solutions.While the tool is highly customizable, setting it up for a specific workflow can take considerable time and effort, which may be challenging for teams with limited technical resources.Although it integrates well with other tools, Helix ALM doesn't natively offer the same level of real-time collaboration features (e.g., chat or collaboration spaces) that some other project management tools do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Provides excellent traceability throughout the entire development lifecycle. You can trace from requirements to test cases, test results, and issues, ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Allows for impact analysis to see how changes to requirements affect other areas. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI feels outdated compared to modern Agile tools like Jira. Performance can lag when handling large repositories, especially on web clients. Setup and onboarding require expertise, and there's a steep learning curve for teams not familiar with Jazz architecture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We're using EWM to manage development across multiple teams in a highly regulated industry. It helps ensure compliance through enforced workflows, audit trails, and tight integration with requirements and test management tools. This has significantly improved traceability and reduced audit risk. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We would like to have an auto-refresh feature to reflect recent modifications made in our plugin definitions. As of now, we have to manually refresh the cache to view the changes. Also, we need to ensure that the parameters used in our code must be unique across all events so that there aren't any misconfigurations. It would be great to have an enhancement to simplify this tedious task of maintaining our code structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are getting familiar with the Tuleap Framework for our event management activities as we started using it recently. It helps organize our regular events which take place through hooks & system events. Unlike other Frameworks, it doesn't impose restrictions on the Event class so we can define constructors, getters, setters and private members as per our requirements. It also gives recommendations for naming our hooks based on the selection of plugins and code execution patterns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.