IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons

IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users find webMethods Integration to be extremely user-friendly, making it accessible even for beginners with its detailed options. (16 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to offer fast and easy integration, enhancing operational efficiency and user experience. (15 mentions)

Users highlight the easy integrations with webMethods, allowing for quick setup and efficient hybrid connectivity. (14 mentions)

Users commend the easy integration of cloud apps with webMethods Integration, boosting efficiency and minimizing errors. (10 mentions)

Users value the seamless connectivity of webMethods Integration, enabling efficient integration across diverse systems and applications. (6 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to be expensive, raising concerns about its overall cost and value. (7 mentions)

Users face a steep learning curve with webMethods Integration, making initial training and setup challenging. (4 mentions)

Users find the poor documentation of webMethods Integration challenging, making it hard for beginners to develop independently. (4 mentions)

Users often face complex usability challenges with webMethods Integration, struggling with steep learning curves and other issues. (3 mentions)

Users find the documentation unclear, making it difficult for beginners to understand and navigate the system effectively. (3 mentions)

G2 reviews are authentic and verified.

Here's how.

Srikanth G.

webMethods Consultant Thro' SoftwareAG

Government Relations

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/3/2015

"webmethods intregration, BPM and SOA"

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Integrates almost any thing and everything with relates to applications in an enterprise, services, devices, processes. Data across business partners. Most reliable technologies in the integration side. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

So far haven't found any thing that I dislike with this product line. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

4/24/2015

"Integrated various legacy ERP's into a single logical R12 instance."

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Supportability or various types of systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. not reliable with huge transactions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Internet

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

5/10/2014

"Not great"

2.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

I worked at a company that used WebMethods for a lot of custom client work; I used it to solve a lot of integration problems. As a whole it is pretty flexible and powerful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

You have to use their IDE, which is pretty restrictive. There is no good way to make changes if you don't use it.

At the time I used this, different versions of WebMethods required different versions of the IDE, so I had to have 3 different IDEs installed at all times depending on which site I was working on. This could have changed, I used the product professionally until about 2012.

It took me a really long time to learn how to use. Their approach is pretty unconventional.

I don't know why they thought that the visual interface would make things easier to work with, it really didn't. They would have been better off with a solid DSL that could be editing in any text editor than the restrictive solution that they chose. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

I'd pick a different product. Preferably something open source, and accessible to a software engineer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

Integrating enterprise apps with each other. Doing data transforms, basic map of fields between systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Internet

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

9/5/2014

"Solid but overwhelming"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

This tool is very useful and makes integrating services together easy, once you know what you are doing. Using this in conjunction with our product we were able to integrate to any system that already existed for our clients. This helped us make deals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

It was very difficult to learn how to properly set it up. Also because it had many options there were sometimes more than one way to do the same thing, and so when maintaining it you would need to know all of those options. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

It is a useful tool, however if you don't need something to handle high volume then the learning curve might not make it worth it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

We need to integrate the data from our systems to existing systems our customers used. We would have a lot of data at a high volume that would need to be transferred and webMethods did the job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Shazafar K.

Project Architect

Retail

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

5/14/2014

"webMethods as a middle-ware tool is an overall solution for your Integration and ESB needs."

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The versatile feature set that the webMethods product suite offers is exhaustive and it offers an industry class solution for every Integration need. It is one of the best product suites for use as an ESB solution. I have never faced any integration problem that we have not been able to solve using what's available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Some of the proprietary implementations for integration concepts does not allow for custom development. For example, the JMS implementation is customized and any change to it requires an engineering fix from SAG. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Package/Freight Delivery

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

10/14/2014

"Webmethods Integration Server"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The Integrations server IDE, with 9.6 version has migrated from product specific IDE to eclipse based IDE. This is the best part. I also like the components that Software AG provide out of the box. I like flow process, adapter etc.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The server being slow at times and can not run a developer environment on a laptop, because of all the services that WM installs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Chandra M.

Senior Systems Analyst

Retail

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

10/14/2014

"In-memory Big data streaming and Dynamic scaling"

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

I really like the big data streaming to personalize customer experience. I also like the dynamic on- premises webMethods scaling via command central. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Dynamic scaling is not available for broker server. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vikas W.

Workday Integrations Practice Lead

Information Technology and Services

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

5/8/2014

"Worked for company and product for several years"

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Integration server and Trading networks are the best products among all. Both are mature and stable products. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

webmethods Workflow and optimize, still more needed in these one. Not stable enough and has limited capabilities Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tom L.

Solution Architect

Food & Beverages

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4/16/2013

"Excellent Integration Tool"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Web Methods can be used to integrate a variety of systems in any IT landscape together. The bigger your business is and the more systems you'll have in your landscape, the more you'll need a tool like this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

WebMethods has been around for a long time and while there have been some improvements to the interface, it's starting to show signs of age compared to some of the newer integration tools in the marketplace. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

Check out some of the other alternative solutions (i.e. TIBCO) just to make sure you're doing your due diligence when selecting the best tool for your business needs. WebMethods has been around for a long time though and will most likely fit the bill. Additionally, make sure you have an experienced admin on hand for the implementation. Trying to have in-house resources figure it out for the first time will prove to be disastrous. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Erich R.

Co-founder & CSO

Internet

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

12/20/2012

"Excellent Middleware tool for Enterprise Software"

3/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

At my former company, we used this tool extensively for connecting ERP systems to our software tool. This is an absolutely fantastic tool for mapping data and connecting systems together. At the end of the day, it's a bit cheaper than competing solutions like CastIron, but I've not really found any disadvantages to this tool compared with others despite the cheaper licensing cost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The interface can be slightly harder to use than one would like. Also, have had some problems on Mac with this tool. This was a bit of time ago, and it certainly was not a deal breaker at the time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

This tool helps to solve a very very complex problem in enterprise software, so the solution itself is inherently difficult to get up to speed on. It has a bit of learning curve, and I would recommend the WebMethods training and certification programs if you would truly like to be skilled in using this product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.