IBM webMethods Integration Pricing Overview

We have been using webMethods Integration Server for almost 20 years, and it has been enormously successful in our organization. We've applied it in many varied application to application and business to business integration scenarios. We've used it to standardize how we integrate disparate technologies in our environment. We have always found it to be relatively cheap in terms of the hours of effort it takes a good webMethods developer to build a robust solution. Developing in the webMethods Flow language is incredibly easy and intuitive, and the graphical presentation in the tooling of data structures and the logic to map or translate between them, the bread and butter of this kind of software, is second to none. It has excellent performance characteristics given that it runs on the Java Virtual Machine. , and the ability to drop from webMethods flow down to pure Java code is an extra escape hatch when you need the very best performance possible. However, the thing I like the best about webMethods Integration Server is how extensible it is, which means we have used it to solve problems way beyond its usual remit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike most about webMethods Integration Server is the lack of name recognition and attendant reputation in the general tech community. Software AG and webMethods are not well known outside of the technology integration niche, and that means that some other big guys that are better known because they don't just play in the integration space are looked on by laypeople such as executive level managers as a better safter choice. However, webMethods is the market leading technology in the integration space, and in my opinion has been the leader for 20 years. It's a shame it is still in the shadow of some other bigger names that have lesser competing products in the same space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The convenience with which new C2C integration is established is quite suitable for restless ones and the advanced library of prehand connectors and user-friendly GUI tools is so huge that amateurs can also come out of the collapse stage. It is possible for someone without any experience to create integrations that will be ready in a few weeks. The simplicity with which it connects on-premises and SaaS applications not only permits effective hybrid integrations but also more effective productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't now see any significant drawbacks that require some advance notice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.