IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons

IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users find webMethods Integration to be extremely user-friendly, making it accessible even for beginners with its detailed options. (16 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to offer fast and easy integration, enhancing operational efficiency and user experience. (15 mentions)

Users highlight the easy integrations with webMethods, allowing for quick setup and efficient hybrid connectivity. (14 mentions)

Users commend the easy integration of cloud apps with webMethods Integration, boosting efficiency and minimizing errors. (10 mentions)

Users value the seamless connectivity of webMethods Integration, enabling efficient integration across diverse systems and applications. (6 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to be expensive, raising concerns about its overall cost and value. (7 mentions)

Users face a steep learning curve with webMethods Integration, making initial training and setup challenging. (4 mentions)

Users find the poor documentation of webMethods Integration challenging, making it hard for beginners to develop independently. (4 mentions)

Users often face complex usability challenges with webMethods Integration, struggling with steep learning curves and other issues. (3 mentions)

Users find the documentation unclear, making it difficult for beginners to understand and navigate the system effectively. (3 mentions)

G2 reviews are authentic and verified.

Here's how.

Aditya D.

Associate

Information Technology and Services

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/9/2016

"Webmethods : A good tool but can improve "

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

WebMethods is a great service that can allow you to share data between multiple software applications. It comes with a fully designed IDE that gives us access to everything we need to design and develop and complete the job on hand. But every IDE comes with a bit of learning effort. I worked with a team where we were trying to utilize webMethods and overall had a positive experience with webMethods. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Some of the product releases were done in a hurry which resulted in issues to upgrade our projects. This brought in a bit of confusion among the team but all in all everything was good in the end. Would suggest to patiently review the releases and release timelines Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Hospital & Health Care

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4/20/2017

"webMethods Review"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Availability of the support when needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Promptness of the support when we have an issue with the product Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sanjay S.

Practice Head, Integrations & Cloud

Information Technology and Services

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/1/2016

"If you need a reliable & feature rich integration platform"

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Having worked on various integration products for a long time, webMethods remains my favorite. The ease of use coupled with reliability and scalability are core to it's functionality. It also helps that, no matter what kind of integration you're looking for, you're likely to find a match in it's product offerings e.g. SOA, BPM, CEP, B2B etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Certain product release (specially for new one's) seems to be rushed and result in major issues for an upgrade project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

webMethods is an expensive product, however, it serves very well if implemented for suitable functional needs. Please do due diligence and spend time during requirements, sizing and architecture of webMethods implementation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

In past few years, I've implemented eCommerce, webMethods platform-as-as-service solutions, payment processing etc. The benefits in terms of saving cost on transaction processing via VANs or other paid data centers have been significant. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Altaf A.

Mulesoft Developer

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

1/27/2017

"Fast integration "

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Composite Application framework used to create web pages Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

My webMethods server is too confusing to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Government Administration

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

2/2/2017

"webMethods "

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

enables us to rapidly integrate systems, services, devices, processes, business partners and data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

sometimes there are a few errors that need to be fixed Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

Definitely worth trying it. I would definitely recommend to try it if you have the resources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

Reduced time and cost to integrate new applications by eliminating complex point-to-point connections.

Provision back-end data and capabilities to power enterprise mobile apps in a secure and well-managed fashion.

On-board partners faster and reduce errors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ESHAN K.

Associate Java/Hadoop Developer

Information Technology and Services

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/10/2016

Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"Smaller Project's Ideal tool"

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

webMethods is an incredible administration that can permit you to share information between various programming applications and trade messages a great deal simpler. It has a full fledged IDE that gives you access to all that you have to fulfill this. There is obviously somewhat of an expectation to absorb information. I took a shot at a group of understudies who were attempting to use webMethods and we had a little inconvenience toward the starting however by and large had a positive involvement with webMethods Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

As a gathering we felt a general loathing for the way the IDE was setup. A portion of the elements that we would go searching for would be covered up and clouded in a convoluted interface. Others were more straightforward so it was somewhat of a give and take. Lamentably the backing for a venture of this greatness is somewhat missing and when we ran into issues and issues we thought that it was difficult to get help (We are understudies all things considered). On the other side of that since we were dealing with a school venture the application was somewhat thought up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Paper & Forest Products

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4/19/2017

"This statement suggests that the process of creating complex logic for applications is straightforward and uncomplicated."

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Use the flow language to write the service logic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

There is no text to translate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

myx x.

CEO

Insurance

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/1/2016

"Able to seemlessly connect many systems and applications using the webMethods Integration Platform"

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

- Connect any system or application silo with plug-and-play ease

- Share data across systems

- Link mobile and SaaS apps securely with enterprise systems

- Use a single B2B gateway for connecting all trading partners

- Re-use services and systems to accelerate time to market

- Re-use existing assets to lower TCO

Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Expensive to get full education and training Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Satya Srinivas C.

Senior Software Engineer

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

6/1/2016

"perfect product Suite for Integrations"

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

1) Individual tool for each set of operations.

2) Constant upgrade in versions to improve and add features to meet the business requirements.

3) Awesome product that I have worked so far. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

1) Lack of complete guidelines to use new features.

2) Client who use webMethods are not high in number. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

Even though being an expensive product in the market, It helps design everyone problem looks quite simple to solve. Ofcourse they proved !!! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

1) A2A and B2B integrations.

2) EDI integrations.

3) Centrasite for SOA governance.

Highly reliable when designing integration solutions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Laurent F.

RTP chaine critique

Information Technology and Services

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

1/5/2016

"webMethods : quite good integration platform"

4/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

* Thanks to its easy to learn Flow language, it’s quite easy to build even complex integration processes

* As build on asynchronous messages exchanges, BPM are more robust against components outages compared to monolithic solution.

* Efficient clustered solution

* Lot of adapters Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

* Supervision tool (optimize for Infra) is only a joke at least up to 8.2 : It’s missing lot of important figures to really follow ISes’ health (I built in house monitoring based on Flow/Java probes + PHP GUI which is far far more informative than O4I is providing).

* Every patch campaigns needs long regression testings … due to bug and regression introduced by fixes.

* Starting 9.x, administration tools were totally jeopardized among several interfaces : IS Admin, MWS, Terracotta, UM, …

* not always OpenSources friendly. Especially, web services are quite limited (a shame for such product) and I had to fight against wM to make them usable by PHP WS clients : wM's WS stack doesn't support all variants of WS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

You need good Architects and good admin otherwise it is easy to misuse or jeopardize the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

As long as the architecture is mastered and strict development guide lines enforced, the ROI is very good and fast … despite the price of the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.