IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons

IBM webMethods Integration Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users find webMethods Integration to be extremely user-friendly, making it accessible even for beginners with its detailed options. (16 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to offer fast and easy integration, enhancing operational efficiency and user experience. (15 mentions)

Users highlight the easy integrations with webMethods, allowing for quick setup and efficient hybrid connectivity. (14 mentions)

Users commend the easy integration of cloud apps with webMethods Integration, boosting efficiency and minimizing errors. (10 mentions)

Users value the seamless connectivity of webMethods Integration, enabling efficient integration across diverse systems and applications. (6 mentions)

Users find webMethods Integration to be expensive, raising concerns about its overall cost and value. (7 mentions)

Users face a steep learning curve with webMethods Integration, making initial training and setup challenging. (4 mentions)

Users find the poor documentation of webMethods Integration challenging, making it hard for beginners to develop independently. (4 mentions)

Users often face complex usability challenges with webMethods Integration, struggling with steep learning curves and other issues. (3 mentions)

Users find the documentation unclear, making it difficult for beginners to understand and navigate the system effectively. (3 mentions)

G2 reviews are authentic and verified.

Here's how.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4/12/2021

Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"Smooth and efficient"

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The ease with which Integration functions can be completed on cloud. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Not all bundles or libraries of various languages are supported. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Retail

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

12/7/2020

"not the best, but not the worst"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Lot of out of the box packages to build a service faster. setup an ESB infrastructure and develop services faster. tailor suit products for each use like MFT, B2B etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

setup of the product and prerequisites

debug an in-flight transaction

performance tuning options.

product bugs are annoying

many products are not stable in the first release and lot of fix packs, and updates needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

4/26/2020

"Using WebMethod Integration Server for Internal SaaS integration as contract solution provider"

3/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

WebMethod IS has many readily built components that cover almost every aspect of Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) with consistent way of implementation.

It also go beyond EIP to include enterprise security, webservice, messaging, database connectivity service components ... etc. which are widely used features in Java EE implementation.

It allows user to further customized / extent the service components using Java programming but it's not straight-forward.

Deployment is simple if you design the solution as recommended in the training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

1. The learning curve could be hard initially, especially those who new in Software AG webMethods product.

2. The product (IS Designer) also run slow in average spec PC, especially those work in a assigned virtual desktop i.e Citrix, VMWare with 2-4 cores CPU.

3. Despite the rich features, the UI are somehow not intuitive, need to try & error lot of times before succeed & community helps & practical usage examples are scarce if searched over Google. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

webMethods IS Cloud is best used if your organization has lot of sub system which do not designed base on same architecture, or legacy systems which was created over different period where their output format, technology varies and your company is fully ready for working online. webMethods Integration Cloud ease routing of transaction/data, transform / map them accordingly as needed, save cost by orchestrating existing systems for new goal without need to develop a new one . Dedicated System Administrator is a must when implemented at full scale to take care of network/system performance issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

I'm using webMethods Integration Server to create SaaS services facade in private cloud to serve requests & do routing to other nodes for further process. In this project I'm using SOAP Web Service, both as producer & consumer. Web Service Descriptors are used to publish implementation details to other potential IS user. The request, depends on incoming parameters, will either be processed & returned as producer, or route to other web-services as consumer for further data processing which results are further aggregated before response back to service call. The respective SOAP web service are written in JavaEE separately.

I've used components i.e sequence, branch, map etc. to create my routing flow service. I find it quite reusable at times where they can be 'invoke' from other flow (not even need to copy-paste). The debugging of flow service also good that it allows to see the output of each steps and simulate it using different variables. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Francesco G.

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

9/24/2020

Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"The perfect solutions for our clients' needs"

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Flexibility of Cloud version has been a key factor for our clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

User interface for Cloud version should be more customizable Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kuldeep G.

Lead Consultant

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

12/3/2020

Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"Best Integration tool with masive experience of handling mission critical projects"

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

It's knowledge base & lot of sitting experts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Frequent version update & delay to get new feature request. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer Software

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

12/9/2020

"A Seemless Experience"

4.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The easy of use for someone who has no idea about ESB. It helped us to easily achieve our requirement and also improve the our application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Nothing that I can think of. The integrations to modern products would be helful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Insurance

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

12/5/2020

"webMethods is very apt for B2B integrations with new CICD process and very well maintainable"

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Easy configurable and maintainable.

JMS, IS and MWS are my favorite Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

version control doesn’t fit very well, searching for code isn’t reliable Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Government Administration

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

5/13/2020

"Nexgen Rapid Framework to produce a reproducible code for any new interfaces!"

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

For every new interface, we have a reusable code that you can replicate.

API management and EDI are the most important components of the solution. It has allowed us to integrate some systems that require a type of translation.

The time is fairly short to launch. For Java users, it's easy to understand. It's better to handle it. Extensive toolset, including library help out-of-the-box. It time effectively by reducing production time and resource utilization, increasing mobility, and the convergence between end-to-end applications and integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The mapping tool for the Flow language might be a bit easier to use. DevOps will need to be considered since the project begins. Documentation has to be calibrated, SoftwareAG has a lot of reliance on it. You could fight to execute scenarios without the assistance of Software AG, even with the documentation at hand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering IBM webMethods Integration:

Use cloud version since the initial stages of project as its painful to migrate later. Its also relatively cheaper to get a cloud version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is IBM webMethods Integration solving and how is that benefiting you?

Enterprise integration of multiple in house IT applications.SoftwareAG's Webmethods suite is an enterprise bus that is used for all integrations, bringing all transfers of messages into one program, and making monitoring and integration simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Building Materials

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

11/27/2020

"The review"

3.5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The versatile options available at the time of debugging is a good experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The graphical approach for coding is tiring for a regular coder. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Piotr S.

CFO

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

4/17/2018

"The most efficient non open source ESB on the market"

5/5

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The solution is high-speed and efficient. I appreciate the partnership approach to cooperation, also after software implementation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.