I’ve been able to pick up how to use DNG pretty quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It can be slow and crash randomly when I’m working on a project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
integrated solution that ties DNG, RTC, and RQM together Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
performance is less than ideal
user interface between all three tools are inconsistent Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The breadth of the app to control requirements with change sets and streams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Migrating to it from nothing prior, no documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The fact that DNG is web-based and cloud-based is already a major improvement over legacy DOORS. I find the user interface more intuitive than legacy DOORS. There is a strong online community for help and support. IBM has been fairly responsive to our problem reports. Using custom reports created with Rational Publishing Engine, we have been able to produce well formatted documents that are deliverable to our client with very little manual formatting to do outside of DNG. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Complex Boolean filters that existed in legacy DOORS are missing from DNG. The commenting feature is half-baked, for example, comments on an artifact disappear when the artifact is removed from a module, and comments cannot easily be exported from DNG. Even at version 6.0.4., there are still some user interface bugs, such as the page not displaying properly after scrolling quickly. There is no way to export the comparison between two baselines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Linking and integration with configuration management tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
High cost is a barrier to 100% usage by our engineers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
DNG has an intuitive web interface, with project data organized in a structured hierarchy. It's easy to filter, search and identify inter-dependencies of project artifacts. The storyboard capabilities and graphical link explorer facilitate excellent requirements elicitation. The capabilities it brings to the Requirements Management solution via Collections and Modules are indispensable for efficient requirements management solution both for Software and Systems Development teams. It's definitely a happy marriage between RequisitePro and Legacy Doors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
None. I would be inclined to say cost of ownership and maintenance, but measuring the improved efficiencies of teams and the overall improvement in the quality of the product and/or systems develop it outweighs it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I love the way I can easily use the product Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The colors are very beautiful and I like to look at them Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Versatility and tracability across the other CLM apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Performance issues and reindexing are cumbersome Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Most important thing for RQM is it can connect to automation test system,, and run automatic test scripts, produce automation test report. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
When you open a defect link in a test case, it will jump to RTC web page, and close current test case web page, which is quite bad for you to analyse the defect related with the corresponding test case. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
good tool for managing requirements and their depedencies
possibility for requirement versioining
possibility to make collectoin of requirements - represents product demands or features
tight integration with Rational QM (requirement testing tool)
good support from IBM Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
very complex tool
hard to manage
heavy demands on server (java based), slow performance Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.