Coderbyte for Employers Pros and Cons

Online use - ease of setting up questions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UI is complicated and not particularly intuitive.

In evaluate tests, it'd be nice to be able to send tests to internal devs to eval with others the difficulty of the tests.

For testing in C#, the compiler version is v4, which is approx 10ys old. New dev uses in v8 or 9, and soon 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A good-enough database of challenges at a price that is management for a small business. Many similar products cost more than $5000 a year and don't have a way to implement them without committing to pay. For a startup or small organization, this is really not worth the money. However, this product can be had for as little as $200 monthly for a limit-less account. For businesses with a lot of applicants, it is easy to pre-screen people based on their technical capabilities before wasting resources on interviewing for cultural fit, etc.

I recommend creating an assessment with both easy and harder challenges to better gauge the level of the person. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the challenge instructions are confusing and need to be refined. Also, it would be great if I could easily change the language of the challenges instructions.

I also don't like that there isn't (or doesn't appear to be) a way to order the challenges in each assessment. I have to manually instruct candidates to choose the easier challenges. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It captures the screen recording which helps with the reviewing of paper and also detects plagiarism. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to dislike just an added feature of recording realtime video of test taker would be better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The wide range of question bank for a wide range of tech roles is helpful to upscale the hiring process at faster pace. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Time complexity is sometimes wrongly calculated, and tools can be increased as compared to another platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease with which candidates can get code running in any language. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't really ever go back and review old sessions. I don't need them to be saved forever. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that candidates can write codes and make Google searches without leaving the code editor. The support for web frameworks such and Angular and React is superb. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't dislike anything but I would like that screening assessment can accommodate more than 300 candidates at once. The support for new-line when inviting multiple candidates (email addresses) will be good to have instead of just comma separated email addresses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Auto grading and video streams of the whole interview. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not being able to add custom questions and answers instantly. Sometimes we don't need rigorous grading and output checking. Manual assessment is acceptable as well so it would be very useful being able to type a random question ad hoc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Possibility to pick existing questions from pool Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When someone resolve custom task its hard to see results. They are marked with some kind of internal id instead of email/name Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It lower the efforts of the employers, by filtering out the candidates effectively Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Many candidates are complaining regarding submission after completion of the test, i don't know whether it is the site problem or candidates fault Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You can make different combinations of technologies and code tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No cons for now, it is a good platform to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.