Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews & Product Details

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

It does not require too much manual configuration and it is straight forward to set it up and get your critical assets protected against sophisticated attacks using AI and machine learning to automatically understand the behavior of our applications and APIs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The fact that you cannot have two assets with the same URL even though the application is reached using different IP addresses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

What I like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF is that it gives solid protection for our web applications without being hard to use. It automatically detects and blocks threats like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other attacks, so we don’t have to worry about constant monitoring. It also keeps everything running smoothly without slowing things down. The setup is straightforward, and the dashboard makes it easy to see what’s happening. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Some advanced settings can be a bit complex at first, but it works well once set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is great because it uses smart AI to stop new and advanced threats automatically. It’s fully managed, so you don’t have to worry about updates or tuning—Check Point handles everything. It works perfectly with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, scaling up as your traffic grows. It protects against all kinds of attacks, including bots, DDoS, and hacked APIs, all in one place. Plus, it’s easy to control with a single dashboard, making security simple and hassle-free Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be pricey, especially for smaller teams. Setting it up isn't always quick—it might take some time to get everything working smoothly. While it's good at blocking threats, tweaking advanced rules isn't as flexible as some other tools. Since Check Point manages updates, you can't always make changes on your own schedule. Occasionally, it might slow down your apps a tiny bit when inspecting traffic deeply. Still powerful, but worth considering these trade-offs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

I really like how easy it is to deploy in the cloud and how it just works with AWS and Azure. It blocks threats before they get near our apps, and the real-time alerts are super helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

While CloudGuard WAF is effective, the initial configuration and policy tuning can be complex, especially in environments with custom applications. The user interface could also be more intuitive when managing large rule sets or viewing logs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

1. Offers robust protection against a wide range of web application attacks, including SQL injection and cross-site scripting

2. Simplifies the setup process with user-friendly interfaces and quick configuration options

3. Provide real-time visibility into web traffic and security incidents, enabling proactive threat detection Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

1. Higher cost for a small business organization

2. Users might encounter false positives that can disrupt legitimate traffic

3. The extensive features may lead to a steep learning curve for new users, impacting initial adoption Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

1 ) Accurate threat detection with minimal false positives

2) Prevention First approach

3) Reduces operation overhead

4) Good detection technology

5) Minimal false positive

6) Onboarding is easier

7) Best feature is its comprehensive API security and automated API discovery Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

1) Initial onboarding is tedious

2) Documentations needs further improvement

3) Drastic improvements needs in support

4) Need further improvement in antibot Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

What I like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its strong integration with cloud-native environments. It works seamlessly with our AWS deployment, and the automated protections help us stay ahead of evolving threats without constant manual tuning. The UI is intuitive, which makes managing policies and viewing logs much easier, even for team members who aren't deep into security. I also appreciate how responsive the threat intelligence updates are—there's a clear sense that we're being protected with real-time data. Overall, it gives us peace of mind knowing our web applications are secure without creating unnecessary complexity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

While Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a solid solution overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. Occasionally, the initial configuration can be a bit time-consuming, especially for more complex environments. Also, while the documentation is helpful, some sections could benefit from a bit more clarity or real-world examples. That said, once everything is set up, the platform runs smoothly and delivers reliable protection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The interface is easy to understand. When I compare to the competition with overly complex menu and nested option. It’s a bref of fresh air. It’s also cohesive with the rest of checkpoint’s offering Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

With more comprehensive approach I feel that’s it’s missing a few features. Such as a zero trust feature for clients which the competitors offers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The automation of rules and the visibility of logs by category Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

The initial setup was a bit complicated having an AWS behind it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Easy to integrate, support of all use case like root domain mapping, auto discover of API endpoints, Rate limiting of web traffic, customization based on integrated assets. easy to Integrate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Quick Support is a only pain for checkpoint Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.