AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews & Product Details

We use Autosys for automation of our jobs in SAP ECC, HANA, INFA, MFT environments throughout the organisation. All of the process is automated in the systems starting from triggering the job, getting the log, depending jobs etc. This helped us in reducing huge workload and manpower. Our organisation is big and need a lot of manpower in order to manage the jobs. Currently, everything is automated via Autosys and only few around 20 people are managing this via autosys. Customer support we ask for it rarely but they are quick in response. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing to dislike but it will take a lot of work to implement and automate this workflow and also learning it is not easy.

GUI can be improved and more user friendly also can optimise it a bit more.

I don't have any issues with it now, I'm used to it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy job monitoring

Easy to get job dependency and other details

Easy to check job status

Job failure and other logs are captured very descriptive and easy to understand Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Session logout pop up doesn't allow to continue with the session even though you select the timer pop up. Not all job details can be accessed in descrptive form from single selection of box name Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use for technical and non-technical associates

User friendly interface and requires minimum learning curve

Ease of creation of Jils and move to production

On-Ice feature is really helpful to skip run but trigger dependencies Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dynamic DAGs for data pipelines could not be created as available in Airflow

New features not coming in pace as compared to airflow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Minimal coding knowledge is required when compared to airflow where you need efficiency in python.

Its extreme scalability allows us to run more workflows simultaneously.

It is a good alternative to airflow in marketplace. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have a very short experience with this tool, so dint have more dislikes about the tool.

Job failure handling of the job can be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use and costing model

Require minimal coding experience as compared to airflow which demands python proficiency.

Jil creation and deployment to production env is very easy

Concept of boxing cmd jobs in single box Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dynamic Jils feature missing in autosys

Event driven dependency not supported

Config(yaml/json) based JILs not supported like dynamic dags work in airflow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its straight forward and very simple object status. JIL commands and its interpretor is an awesome idea. Like Automic, its execution is from Left to right and so the dependencies setting. In GUI, the Box editor is notable. Its reporting concept is easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since I have worked in Autosys for shorter period and for specific task, I have no dislikes about this tool.

In particular if I want to mention is, its box job failure concept, when a single sub job fails. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Orchestration tool with minimal learning curve available in market

Very easy to develop JILs and move them to production enviornment

On ice feature is a big plus to skip jobs and trigger the dependencies

Packaging multiple cmd jobs in box as single workflow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No config based JIL creation at run time of pipeline

No event based dependency available Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With its simple setup and transparent object status, workload management across several platforms is made simple and economical. One element in particular that sticks out is the Box editor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have concerns about the lack of integration of cloud support with AI, as it presents a drawback in report generation. The customization options for reports could have been better to enhance their effectiveness. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* AutoSys permits clients to plan and manage jobs productively and migrate jobs from

lower to higher conditions.

*Convenience to make JILs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* Making of dynamic jobs features is not accessible as present in airflow.

* AutoSys is a commercial tool, and permitting expenses may be a worry for certain

associations, particularly for more modest organizations or those with restricted

financial plans. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use and require minimum technical knowledge for scheduling and automating jobs

Very easy to create and deploy

JILs

Docker image present on dockerhub Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No concept of creating dynamic autosys job dependency based on config or yaml file like airlfow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.