Compare TYPO3 and WordPress.org 
- Users report that WordPress.org excels in ease of use with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward setup. In contrast, TYPO3's ease of use score is significantly lower at 6.8, which may pose challenges for users unfamiliar with complex systems.
- Reviewers mention that WordPress.org offers a broader range of pre-built templates (8.4) compared to TYPO3 (6.4), allowing users to quickly create visually appealing websites without extensive design skills.
- G2 users highlight the superior content authoring capabilities of WordPress.org, scoring 8.9, which includes features like the Gutenberg block editor that enhances the writing experience. TYPO3, while still functional, scores lower at 8.3, indicating a less intuitive authoring process.
- Users on G2 report that WordPress.org's plugin ecosystem (8.6) is a significant advantage, providing a vast array of options for extending functionality. TYPO3's plugins score lower at 7.1, which may limit customization for users seeking specific features.
- Reviewers say that WordPress.org's community support (8.6) is robust, with a wealth of resources and forums available for troubleshooting. TYPO3's community support is rated lower at 6.9, which could hinder users in need of assistance.
- Users report that TYPO3 shines in enterprise scalability (8.5) and user, role, and access management (8.7), making it a strong choice for larger organizations with complex needs, while WordPress.org scores slightly lower in these areas at 8.2 and 8.6, respectively.
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
