Compare Smartling and Transifex 
- Users report that Smartling excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.1, while Transifex has a slightly lower score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that Smartling's support team is responsive and helpful, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Smartling's Translation Memory features, particularly the Custom Translation Memory and Built-in Translation Memory, score higher at 8.3 and 8.2 respectively, compared to Transifex's 7.9 and 7.6. Users say this allows for more tailored translations and better consistency across projects.
- G2 users highlight Smartling's superior Workflow Management with a score of 8.8, while Transifex lags behind at 7.7. Users report that Smartling's workflows are intuitive and customizable, which enhances team collaboration and efficiency.
- Users on G2 note that Smartling's Automated Translation feature is rated at 8.3, outperforming Transifex's 7.8. Reviewers mention that Smartling's automation capabilities streamline the translation process, saving time and reducing manual effort.
- Reviewers mention that Smartling's Client Management tools score 8.4, compared to Transifex's 7.9. Users report that Smartling provides better tools for managing client relationships and tracking project progress, which is crucial for agencies.
- Users say that Smartling's Continuous Translation feature, rated at 8.5, is a standout compared to Transifex's offerings. Reviewers mention that this feature allows for real-time updates and seamless integration into ongoing projects, enhancing overall productivity.
- Professional Language Services
- Unlimited Projects
- Visual Context
- Unlimited Projects and Files
- Translation Memory
- Transifex AI
I've used other translation CMS in the past and never had difficulties learning the ins and outs of Smartling since the interface is very intuitive. I also like how the high-level contents are organised, which makes things easy to find. I also appreciate...
Reporting in Smartling is not always useful since we have multiple teams with multiple projects using one account with different billing structures. Accounting for project costs have been extremely challenging Issue management is difficult to use-...
It's a great way to split concerns between product and development. It removes the need for a code update for translations and tweaking the copy on a website in general. Integrating it was easy, there was an implementation library for whatever application...
I think the barrier for entry is quite high. What I mean by that is it takes quite a lot of effort from the outset to get it working in the way we want. Have also found the customer support to be quite poor.
I've used other translation CMS in the past and never had difficulties learning the ins and outs of Smartling since the interface is very intuitive. I also like how the high-level contents are organised, which makes things easy to find. I also appreciate...
It's a great way to split concerns between product and development. It removes the need for a code update for translations and tweaking the copy on a website in general. Integrating it was easy, there was an implementation library for whatever application...
Reporting in Smartling is not always useful since we have multiple teams with multiple projects using one account with different billing structures. Accounting for project costs have been extremely challenging Issue management is difficult to use-...
I think the barrier for entry is quite high. What I mean by that is it takes quite a lot of effort from the outset to get it working in the way we want. Have also found the customer support to be quite poor.
