Compare Pages and Scrivener 
- Users report that Scrivener excels in document creation with its robust template creation feature, scoring 9.0, which allows writers to easily structure their projects. In contrast, Pages, while offering decent templates at a score of 8.6, does not provide the same level of customization for writers.
- Reviewers mention that Scrivener's PDF creation capabilities are top-notch, achieving a score of 9.3, making it ideal for authors who need to share their work in a professional format. Pages, however, scores lower at 8.9, indicating it may not be as effective for this specific need.
- G2 users highlight that Scrivener's document editor is highly rated at 9.8, providing a seamless writing experience with features tailored for long-form content. Pages, while still strong at 9.1, lacks some of the specialized tools that Scrivener offers for novelists and screenwriters.
- Users on G2 report that Scrivener's revision history feature, scoring 8.9, is particularly beneficial for tracking changes over time, which is crucial for writers. Pages matches this score but lacks the depth of revision tools that Scrivener provides.
- Reviewers mention that Scrivener's collaborative creation features score lower at 7.7, indicating it may not be the best choice for teams working together in real-time. Pages, however, offers a slightly better experience in this area, with a score of 6.3, suggesting it may be more user-friendly for collaborative projects.
- Users say that Scrivener shines on PC with a perfect score of 10.0, making it a preferred choice for Windows users, while Pages struggles on this platform with a score of 6.2, indicating a significant limitation for those not using Mac.
Pros: Designed with simplicity, easy to use, reliable, great for resumes and cover letters, awesome templates available, free updates, free, tables and charts just like excel, great photo integration, iCloud compatible, wide range of export options.
Some typefaces are not cross-compatible or automatically included that match the default typefaces in Windows-based computers, when working with clients or others not using Mac systems
The ability to rearrange scenes, access pre writing without leaving your main manuscript and use meta data to find important info is invaluable. This kind of functionality makes writing a novel so much more efficient, and also improves your writing because...
No web app. No native collaboration features.
Pros: Designed with simplicity, easy to use, reliable, great for resumes and cover letters, awesome templates available, free updates, free, tables and charts just like excel, great photo integration, iCloud compatible, wide range of export options.
The ability to rearrange scenes, access pre writing without leaving your main manuscript and use meta data to find important info is invaluable. This kind of functionality makes writing a novel so much more efficient, and also improves your writing because...
Some typefaces are not cross-compatible or automatically included that match the default typefaces in Windows-based computers, when working with clients or others not using Mac systems
No web app. No native collaboration features.
