Compare .NET and RubyMotion 
.NET vs RubyMotion
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found .NET easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with .NET overall.
- Reviewers felt that .NET meets the needs of their business better than RubyMotion.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that .NET is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of .NET over RubyMotion.
- Xamarin.Forms
- Xamarin Test Cloud Access
- Visual Studio Integration
The best and the most marketed thing about Xamarin is the cross platform solution with native behavior. All you need to learn is C# and then you are good to make Android, iOS and Windows from one single code base. You dont have to go around and learn Java...
it was much more difficult to implement a cross platform solution as advertised.
Write ups using ruby! Ruby is a much more elegant language than objc and Swift
Compiling error are getting difficult to be debugged sometimes. Basically changing the debugging pattern may help.
The best and the most marketed thing about Xamarin is the cross platform solution with native behavior. All you need to learn is C# and then you are good to make Android, iOS and Windows from one single code base. You dont have to go around and learn Java...
Write ups using ruby! Ruby is a much more elegant language than objc and Swift
it was much more difficult to implement a cross platform solution as advertised.
Compiling error are getting difficult to be debugged sometimes. Basically changing the debugging pattern may help.
