Compare Microsoft Access and MySQL 
Microsoft Access vs MySQL
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found MySQL easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with MySQL overall.
- Reviewers felt that MySQL meets the needs of their business better than Microsoft Access.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that MySQL is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of MySQL over Microsoft Access.
Of the many businesses I have worked for all have one thing in common. They track data in a spreadsheet. Access takes Data analysis to a new level. Many people don't know that if built correctly your database can cross reference between many fields of data...
It's a very simple form of database supporting small/medium size of data. It slows down exceptionally when queries are run on large datasets.
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
Open source have issues in resolving things slow
Of the many businesses I have worked for all have one thing in common. They track data in a spreadsheet. Access takes Data analysis to a new level. Many people don't know that if built correctly your database can cross reference between many fields of data...
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
It's a very simple form of database supporting small/medium size of data. It slows down exceptionally when queries are run on large datasets.
Open source have issues in resolving things slow
