Compare MDaemon Email Server and Zimbra Collaboration 
- Users report that Zimbra Collaboration excels in its screen sharing capabilities, with a rating of 9.4, making it a strong choice for teams that prioritize visual collaboration. In contrast, MDaemon Email Server does not offer this feature, which may limit its effectiveness for users needing robust collaboration tools.
- Reviewers mention that MDaemon Email Server has a higher ease of setup score (8.9) compared to Zimbra Collaboration (6.9), indicating that users find MDaemon more straightforward to implement, which can be crucial for organizations looking to minimize downtime during deployment.
- G2 users highlight that MDaemon Email Server provides superior quality of support (8.8) compared to Zimbra Collaboration (7.7). This difference suggests that users may experience more responsive and helpful customer service with MDaemon, which can be vital for troubleshooting and ongoing support.
- Users on G2 report that Zimbra Collaboration's generative AI features, such as AI Text Generation (7.7), are beneficial for enhancing productivity, although they are not as highly rated as MDaemon's overall performance in other areas, which may appeal to users focused on email management rather than AI capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that MDaemon Email Server shines in its product direction score (8.7), indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features, while Zimbra Collaboration's score (5.6) suggests potential concerns about its long-term viability and innovation.
- Users say that MDaemon Email Server's mobile application (8.9) is user-friendly and effective, while Zimbra Collaboration lacks a comparable mobile experience, which could be a deciding factor for teams that require flexibility and access on the go.
- Easy to Use
- Account Hijack Detection
- Spam Reporting
It's not easy to describe what I like about the MDaemon mail server, there are too many things. First of all, this is the interface. I'm not going to say that the interface is perfect, but I'll say for sure that it's the best I've ever had to deal with....
The MDaemon connector for outlook leaves a lot to be desired. Undo frequently fails. Sorting and searching frequently fail. As mailboxes get bigger with many attachments, the client gets buggier and buggier. Part of Alt-N's response is to add an exclusion...
Besides of e-mail feature, there are a lot of more useful features like calendars and task list. Also provides connectivity through IMAP/POP, CalDAV and CarDAV to external clients. Possibility to use and develop plugins (Zimlets) and multi language support...
The backup system is not flexible. It is very difficult recover only one specific email. Basically need to do a rollback of many messages to find one specific. The email system is very dependent of database server. If there is need of HA solution, it will...
It's not easy to describe what I like about the MDaemon mail server, there are too many things. First of all, this is the interface. I'm not going to say that the interface is perfect, but I'll say for sure that it's the best I've ever had to deal with....
Besides of e-mail feature, there are a lot of more useful features like calendars and task list. Also provides connectivity through IMAP/POP, CalDAV and CarDAV to external clients. Possibility to use and develop plugins (Zimlets) and multi language support...
The MDaemon connector for outlook leaves a lot to be desired. Undo frequently fails. Sorting and searching frequently fail. As mailboxes get bigger with many attachments, the client gets buggier and buggier. Part of Alt-N's response is to add an exclusion...
The backup system is not flexible. It is very difficult recover only one specific email. Basically need to do a rollback of many messages to find one specific. The email system is very dependent of database server. If there is need of HA solution, it will...
