Compare IBM App Connect and Jitterbit 
- Users report that IBM App Connect excels in pre-built connectors with a score of 9.3, making it easier to integrate with various applications quickly. In contrast, Jitterbit's pre-built connectors scored only 7.5, which may require more manual setup and configuration.
- Reviewers mention that IBM App Connect's API Designer is highly rated at 9.3, providing a user-friendly interface for creating APIs. Jitterbit, however, received a lower score of 8.1, indicating that users may find it less intuitive for API development.
- G2 users highlight that IBM App Connect offers superior data transformation capabilities with a score of 9.7, allowing for more complex data manipulations. Jitterbit's score of 8.1 suggests it may not handle intricate data transformations as effectively.
- Users on G2 report that IBM App Connect's real-time integration capabilities are robust, scoring 8.8, which is essential for businesses needing immediate data updates. Jitterbit matches this score but lacks the same level of user satisfaction in this area.
- Reviewers mention that IBM App Connect's workflow automation features are rated at 8.9, providing users with efficient tools to streamline processes. Jitterbit's score of 8.8 indicates it is competitive but may not offer the same level of automation ease.
- Users say that IBM App Connect's data security features are highly rated at 9.1, ensuring that sensitive information is well protected. Jitterbit, while still strong at 9.2, may not have the same breadth of security features as IBM App Connect.
Variety of connectors, easy to setup and test, we have used it to integrate applications based on WebServices, Oracle + others, Currently, the platform is extended by at least one more system a year.
Configuration, not coding approach means it isn't extensible for some common enterprise business scenarios. For example, a client had a requirement that involved encrypting a file and transferring it to an FTP server. After going back and forth with IBM...
Clean interface, powerful data transformation/mapping capabilities, powerful workflow automation capabilities (paid version). The amazing technical engineers/architects & account reps. that work for Jitterbit. Truly is the best-of-breed, as far as...
Much of the time I use it as a replacement for Salesforce Dataloader. Where you just want to do simple data loads and extracts. Anything more than this and I end up using a more beefier solution like Talend Open Studio or CastIron/Informatica. Whenever I...
Variety of connectors, easy to setup and test, we have used it to integrate applications based on WebServices, Oracle + others, Currently, the platform is extended by at least one more system a year.
Clean interface, powerful data transformation/mapping capabilities, powerful workflow automation capabilities (paid version). The amazing technical engineers/architects & account reps. that work for Jitterbit. Truly is the best-of-breed, as far as...
Configuration, not coding approach means it isn't extensible for some common enterprise business scenarios. For example, a client had a requirement that involved encrypting a file and transferring it to an FTP server. After going back and forth with IBM...
Much of the time I use it as a replacement for Salesforce Dataloader. Where you just want to do simple data loads and extracts. Anything more than this and I end up using a more beefier solution like Talend Open Studio or CastIron/Informatica. Whenever I...
