Compare Filestage and Ziflow 
- Users report that Filestage excels in its Smart Compare feature, which received a perfect score of 9.8, allowing for seamless comparison of different versions of files. In contrast, Ziflow does not have a comparable feature that matches this level of functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Filestage's version management is highly praised, scoring 9.8, which helps teams keep track of changes and updates efficiently. Ziflow, while still effective, scored slightly lower in this area, indicating that Filestage may offer a more robust solution for version control.
- G2 users highlight Filestage's superior analytics capabilities, with a score of 8.0, which provides valuable insights into project performance. Ziflow's analytics score of 7.8 suggests that it may not deliver the same depth of analysis, potentially impacting decision-making for users.
- Users on G2 appreciate Ziflow's permissions management, which scored 9.3, allowing for detailed control over who can access and edit files. Filestage's score of 8.4 indicates that while it offers permissions, Ziflow may provide a more comprehensive approach to user access.
- Reviewers mention that Filestage's branding customization options, scoring 8.6, allow for a more personalized experience, which is crucial for businesses looking to maintain brand consistency. Ziflow's slightly higher score of 8.7 suggests it may offer marginally better branding features, but the difference is minimal.
- Users say that both platforms have similar workflow templates, each scoring 9.6, indicating that they both provide effective tools for streamlining processes. However, Filestage's overall ease of use score of 9.1 suggests that users may find it more intuitive to implement these workflows compared to Ziflow's score of 8.9.
- Unlimited files, versions, team members and reviewers
- 2 active projects
- 2 GB secure storage
- Support for 1200+ file types
- Unlimited reviewers
- Unlimited reviews
- Having the ability to point out an idea for a change for a video at the exact frame is extremely helpful as a creator. - Being able to comment on a change that a viewer has already made, and then mark that as done is a simple way to make sure ALL...
On the backend, I am frustrated that Filestage can be a little clunky. It should be easier to change from one review lane to the next without having to drag and drop.
The ability to review and comment on interactive pieces like websites is the best feature over PHQ. The user interface is also easy to navigate and customize. I often toggle between page view styles, use the "label" options to easily filter through...
Would love to be able to share public links, export comments directly into a PDF as if it was marked up in a PDF originally, and be able to review password protected assets
- Having the ability to point out an idea for a change for a video at the exact frame is extremely helpful as a creator. - Being able to comment on a change that a viewer has already made, and then mark that as done is a simple way to make sure ALL...
The ability to review and comment on interactive pieces like websites is the best feature over PHQ. The user interface is also easy to navigate and customize. I often toggle between page view styles, use the "label" options to easily filter through...
On the backend, I am frustrated that Filestage can be a little clunky. It should be easier to change from one review lane to the next without having to drag and drop.
Would love to be able to share public links, export comments directly into a PDF as if it was marked up in a PDF originally, and be able to review password protected assets
