Compare Esri ArcGIS and Google Earth Pro 
- Users report that Esri ArcGIS excels in Data Manipulation with a score of 9.0, allowing for complex data transformations and analyses, while Google Earth Pro, with a score of 8.1, is seen as more limited in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Esri ArcGIS offers superior Spatial Analysis capabilities, scoring 9.3 compared to Google Earth Pro's 8.5, making it a preferred choice for users needing in-depth geographic analysis.
- G2 users highlight that Google Earth Pro shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.9, making it more accessible for beginners, whereas Esri ArcGIS has a lower score of 7.3, indicating a steeper learning curve.
- Users on G2 report that Esri ArcGIS provides robust Map Design features, scoring 9.1, which allows for detailed and customizable maps, while Google Earth Pro, although user-friendly, does not match this level of design flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that Google Earth Pro's Real-Time Streaming capabilities, scoring 8.2, are more user-friendly compared to Esri ArcGIS's lower score of 7.9, making it easier for users to access live data.
- Users say that Esri ArcGIS's Data Visualization features are top-notch, with a score of 9.0, providing advanced options for presenting data, while Google Earth Pro matches this score but lacks some of the advanced customization options available in ArcGIS.
- Plans are renewed on a yearly basis.
- Technical Support is included as part of the subscription.
- Service credits are consumed when you use certain services in Esri's cloud, such as geocoding, hosted feature or tile services, or spatial analysis.
I like that I can use ArcGIS to communicate with fellow scientist all over the world about a specific area I am researching. We can share updated updated maps and data instantly. I like that Esri also makes softwares such as Collector and Survey123 to work...
Support in the past several years is less user friendly and accessible. It is not easy to find topics on the older software, and all efforts are directed toward on-line products. Our small rural county does not have resources to employ these products, and...
Due to my experience as an engineer, this tool helps me a lot. Different projects need a lot of site information while you don't have the luxury of time to check it on spot hence google earth becomes the most convenient tool. It helps locate building,...
Some of the capabilities are awkward, and the movements of the Earth can be nauseating. Some of these features can be changed, but it seems difficult to figure out what works best.
I like that I can use ArcGIS to communicate with fellow scientist all over the world about a specific area I am researching. We can share updated updated maps and data instantly. I like that Esri also makes softwares such as Collector and Survey123 to work...
Due to my experience as an engineer, this tool helps me a lot. Different projects need a lot of site information while you don't have the luxury of time to check it on spot hence google earth becomes the most convenient tool. It helps locate building,...
Support in the past several years is less user friendly and accessible. It is not easy to find topics on the older software, and all efforts are directed toward on-line products. Our small rural county does not have resources to employ these products, and...
Some of the capabilities are awkward, and the movements of the Earth can be nauseating. Some of these features can be changed, but it seems difficult to figure out what works best.
