Compare Drupal and TYPO3 
- Users report that Drupal excels in Customization with a score of 8.3, allowing for extensive modifications to meet specific business needs, while TYPO3 falls short with a score of 7.0, indicating less flexibility in this area.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong Content Authoring capabilities, scoring equally at 8.3, but users on G2 highlight that Drupal's rich text editor is more intuitive, enhancing the overall authoring experience.
- G2 users note that Drupal's User Community is robust, scoring 8.5, which provides a wealth of resources and support, whereas TYPO3's community, with a score of 6.9, is perceived as less active and supportive.
- Users say that TYPO3 shines in Internationalization with a score of 8.7, making it a better choice for businesses targeting multiple languages, while Drupal's score of 8.2, although strong, does not match TYPO3's capabilities in this area.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms offer good SEO features, but Drupal's score of 8.1 is slightly higher than TYPO3's 7.8, indicating that users find Drupal's SEO tools more effective for improving site visibility.
- Users report that while both platforms have decent Quality of Support, Drupal's score of 7.4 is slightly better than TYPO3's 7.0, suggesting that users feel more satisfied with the support they receive from Drupal.
One of the few open source project whichbhas seen such wide adoption by enterprises
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
One of the few open source project whichbhas seen such wide adoption by enterprises
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
