Compare Drupal and Ibexa DXP 
- Users report that Drupal excels in customization with a score of 8.3, allowing for extensive tailoring of features and workflows, while Ibexa DXP, with a score of 8.6, also offers strong customization but is noted for its more user-friendly interface.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal's content authoring capabilities are robust, scoring 8.3, which includes a solid rich text editor at 7.8, whereas Ibexa DXP provides a slightly better versioning feature at 8.6, making it easier to manage content revisions.
- G2 users highlight that Drupal's automated publishing feature scores an impressive 8.5, streamlining content distribution, while Ibexa DXP's automated publishing capabilities are less emphasized, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that Drupal has a strong user community with a score of 8.5, which can be beneficial for support and resources, while Ibexa DXP's community engagement is lower at 6.0, suggesting less peer support.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong SEO capabilities, with Drupal scoring 8.1 and Ibexa DXP at 7.4, but Drupal's flexibility in navigation structures (8.0) is often praised for enhancing user experience and searchability.
- Users say that while both platforms offer API / integrations, Drupal's score of 8.1 indicates a more extensive range of integration options compared to Ibexa DXP's 8.5, which is still commendable but may not be as comprehensive.
- Advanced Content and Product Information management
As an agency who builds websites constantly, we've found that Drupal gives us the most flexibility to be creative and design stunning websites that are also technically sound and easy to manage on the back end.
You get what you pay for though. Unless you know your way around Drupal, have tech savvy folks who can utilize the system and designers who create a website for you that is easy to update, you may have trouble. It's important to keep with the updates, as...
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
The system / UI for managing templates was not intuitive and required manually bookmarking template files once you found them. Otherwise, you would have to spend time hunting for it again a few months later when you finally needed to access it again.
As an agency who builds websites constantly, we've found that Drupal gives us the most flexibility to be creative and design stunning websites that are also technically sound and easy to manage on the back end.
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
You get what you pay for though. Unless you know your way around Drupal, have tech savvy folks who can utilize the system and designers who create a website for you that is easy to update, you may have trouble. It's important to keep with the updates, as...
The system / UI for managing templates was not intuitive and required manually bookmarking template files once you found them. Otherwise, you would have to spend time hunting for it again a few months later when you finally needed to access it again.
