Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Cypress and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Cypress
Cypress
Star Rating
(106)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.2% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plans
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Cypress excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to quickly implement testing frameworks. In contrast, mabl's ease of setup is rated at 8.8, indicating a slightly more complex onboarding process.
  • Reviewers mention that Cypress offers robust test feedback with a score of 9.1, allowing users to easily identify issues during testing. Meanwhile, mabl's test feedback capabilities are not as highly rated, which may lead to less clarity in diagnosing test failures.
  • G2 users highlight Cypress's strong reliability with a score of 9.0, which is crucial for teams that require consistent test results. On the other hand, mabl's reliability score is slightly lower, suggesting that users may experience occasional inconsistencies.
  • Users on G2 report that mabl shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 9.2, which is higher than Cypress's 8.8. This indicates that mabl may provide more effective assistance when users encounter issues.
  • Reviewers mention that Cypress has a strong product direction with a score of 9.5, indicating a clear roadmap and commitment to future enhancements. In contrast, mabl's product direction score of 8.7 suggests that users may have concerns about its long-term development.
  • Users say that Cypress's customization options are rated at 8.8, allowing for tailored testing solutions, while mabl's customization score is lower, which may limit flexibility for teams with specific testing needs.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plans
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
90
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.3
91
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.4
16
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.8
72
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
88
8.7
26
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
18
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress
Cypress
mabl
mabl
Cypress and mabl are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Cypress
Cypress has no unique categories
mabl
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
42.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
17.6%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Cypress
Cypress
Computer Software
43.1%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Financial Services
7.8%
Program Development
2.9%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
22.5%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Cypress
Cypress
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Brad D.
BD
Brad D.
Verified User in Automotive

Not having to litter my automation with webdriverwaits

Most Helpful Critical Review
Michael O.
MO
Michael O.
Verified User in Computer Software

Cypress recording does not work on Gitlab Continuous Integration (CI) without customization. Their tech support says you have to configure custom runners with more memory. I had been paying for Cypress for months before I discovered their recording wasn't...

mabl
mabl
Most Helpful Favorable Review
GV
Gretel V.
Verified User in Insurance

The tool's simplicity and straightforwardness enable our organization to spend more time in carefully planning, analyzing, and prioritizing what needs to be automated and be able to automate and deliver the tests in a small amount of time. This way, the...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Food Production

Inconsistencies in testing environments

Alternatives
Cypress
Cypress Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Add LambdaTest
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
Cypress
Cypress Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 comment
SR
Interact with the app for identity and then resume. Or use API calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more