Compare Collaborator and Gitcolony 
- Users report that Collaborator excels in its "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.0, while Gitcolony falls behind at 6.7, making Collaborator a more user-friendly option for teams looking to streamline their workflow.
- Reviewers mention that Collaborator has a strong "Quality of Support" rating of 7.6, but Gitcolony outperforms it with an 8.0, indicating that Gitcolony may provide better assistance and resources for users facing challenges.
- G2 users highlight that Collaborator's "Product Direction" score is lower at 6.5 compared to Gitcolony's impressive 8.8, suggesting that Gitcolony is perceived as having a more promising future and innovative features.
- Users on G2 report that Collaborator has a higher "Meets Requirements" score of 8.7, indicating that it better aligns with user needs, while Gitcolony's score of 8.3 shows it may not fully meet all user expectations.
- Reviewers say that the "Ease of Setup" for both products is relatively close, with Collaborator at 8.3 and Gitcolony at 8.1, suggesting that both platforms are fairly straightforward to implement, but Collaborator has a slight edge.
- Users say that while both products cater to the enterprise market, Gitcolony has a larger market segment representation at 80% compared to Collaborator's 66.7%, indicating a stronger foothold in the enterprise space.
- Subversion, Git, GitHub, CVS, Mercurial, Perforce and TFS
- Source Code Review
- MySQL Database Support
It's very simple to share files and code scripts with colleagues to get help with problems.
Compared to say github, it's slow and doesn't allow fluid communication. Comments can't be formatted with markdown AFAIK. The client is buggy.
Few awesome features:- - you can choose a merger, this is a very big problem in normal github that whose gonna merge the code and wether the guy is aware of certain problems about the feature. - you can choose you reviewers, it's a must have feature in...
Nothing that u dislike so far. It's provides a great solution at the moment
It's very simple to share files and code scripts with colleagues to get help with problems.
Few awesome features:- - you can choose a merger, this is a very big problem in normal github that whose gonna merge the code and wether the guy is aware of certain problems about the feature. - you can choose you reviewers, it's a must have feature in...
Compared to say github, it's slow and doesn't allow fluid communication. Comments can't be formatted with markdown AFAIK. The client is buggy.
Nothing that u dislike so far. It's provides a great solution at the moment
