Compare Collaborator and Gerrit 
- Users report that Collaborator excels in its ease of setup, scoring 8.3, which reviewers mention makes it a favorable choice for teams looking to get started quickly. In contrast, Gerrit has a lower setup score of 7.6, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Collaborator's quality of support is rated at 7.6, which is higher than Gerrit's 7.1. Users on G2 appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of Collaborator's support team, while some users feel that Gerrit's support could be improved.
- G2 users highlight that Collaborator has a strong product direction score of 6.5, but Gerrit shines with a significantly higher score of 9.2. Reviewers mention that Gerrit's commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates is a major advantage for long-term users.
- Users say that both products meet requirements well, with Collaborator scoring 8.7 and Gerrit at 8.6. However, reviewers mention that Collaborator's user-friendly interface contributes to a more satisfying experience when fulfilling project needs.
- Reviewers mention that while both products cater to enterprise-level needs, Collaborator has a larger market segment presence at 66.7%, which users say reflects its reliability and trustworthiness in larger organizations compared to Gerrit's 50% presence.
- Users on G2 report that Collaborator's overall star rating is 4.0, slightly lower than Gerrit's 4.3. This difference indicates that Gerrit may have a slight edge in overall user satisfaction, as reviewers mention a more polished experience with its features.
- Subversion, Git, GitHub, CVS, Mercurial, Perforce and TFS
- Source Code Review
- MySQL Database Support
Great side-by-side diff view. It's great for easily tracking defects on a file, and seeing all versions of the file that have been uploaded.
Compared to say github, it's slow and doesn't allow fluid communication. Comments can't be formatted with markdown AFAIK. The client is buggy.
The best feature has to be the Code review.The code review gives a side-by-side comparison of the changes made and highlights additions or deletions of code made, also it has gradings ranging from -2 to +2, with -2 being the worst and +2 the best.
There are less number of tutorials (video) for it which make it difficult for the newbies to use it fluently. The rest things were fine and is helpful except the lack of tutorials which sometimes lead to time wastage for resolving a very simple problem.
Great side-by-side diff view. It's great for easily tracking defects on a file, and seeing all versions of the file that have been uploaded.
The best feature has to be the Code review.The code review gives a side-by-side comparison of the changes made and highlights additions or deletions of code made, also it has gradings ranging from -2 to +2, with -2 being the worst and +2 the best.
Compared to say github, it's slow and doesn't allow fluid communication. Comments can't be formatted with markdown AFAIK. The client is buggy.
There are less number of tutorials (video) for it which make it difficult for the newbies to use it fluently. The rest things were fine and is helpful except the lack of tutorials which sometimes lead to time wastage for resolving a very simple problem.
