When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) overall.
I like best that it's friendly for users. Once you have your backend setup and running, all they have to do is sign in and there are their apps based on AD group memberships.
It's clunky. Once you have a certain number of Apps open it will say you can't open any more. The number of apps you can have open seem to change by the hour. I use dual screens and when I remove my laptop, any app opened through Citirx will crash. I have...
It does what it needs to do: runs Windows on your Mac, without rebooting. It supports virtual hard disks, but also Boot camp (dual partition). It takes a fast Mac to make it usable. Since I upgraded my machine (retina Macbook Pro) it shines again. I mainly...
Some features do not work well/have glitches (example: sometimes the CD drive & USB drives will not work on the platform that I need)
I like best that it's friendly for users. Once you have your backend setup and running, all they have to do is sign in and there are their apps based on AD group memberships.
It does what it needs to do: runs Windows on your Mac, without rebooting. It supports virtual hard disks, but also Boot camp (dual partition). It takes a fast Mac to make it usable. Since I upgraded my machine (retina Macbook Pro) it shines again. I mainly...
It's clunky. Once you have a certain number of Apps open it will say you can't open any more. The number of apps you can have open seem to change by the hour. I use dual screens and when I remove my laptop, any app opened through Citirx will crash. I have...
Some features do not work well/have glitches (example: sometimes the CD drive & USB drives will not work on the platform that I need)