Compare Butter CMS and Cockpit CMS 
- Users report that Cockpit CMS has a lower ease of use rating (8.3) compared to Butter CMS (9.2), indicating that Butter CMS may provide a more intuitive user experience for content authors.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Butter CMS is significantly higher (9.6) than that of Cockpit CMS (7.0), suggesting that users of Butter CMS may receive more effective assistance when needed.
- G2 users highlight that the content authoring capabilities of Butter CMS (9.2) are superior to those of Cockpit CMS (7.9), making it a better choice for teams focused on creating and managing content efficiently.
- Users on G2 note that the asset management features in Butter CMS (8.1) are more robust compared to Cockpit CMS (7.1), which can be crucial for organizations that rely heavily on digital assets.
- Reviewers say that the automated publishing feature in Butter CMS (9.0) outperforms Cockpit CMS (8.3), allowing for more streamlined content deployment processes.
- Users report that the API and integrations of Butter CMS (8.9) are more flexible and user-friendly than those of Cockpit CMS (8.3), which can enhance the overall functionality and connectivity of the software within existing tech stacks.
- Enterprise-class SLA
- Multiple Environments
- Multiple Sites
I love how easy it was to add ButterCMS into my existing Rails application without a hassle. The trial period is perfect for testing the waters. The support is exceptional.
On the big picture, the graphical interface has improved, but I don't feel comfortable with the new Collections landing page. I would like to land on the page and have the items already divided by collection. For what concerns the single item of a...
Cockpit CMS allows developers to utilize their normal stack of web technologies (for me, Laravel and VueJS) while still allowing the client to have full control over content-managed areas of the site. This is different from most CMS applications (e.g....
Lack of option to preview the content is a big draw back. Documentation is also a bit difficult due to less number of features available. Need to be more iser friendly. The user interface is not that better. So difficulty in usage. Simple interface rather...
I love how easy it was to add ButterCMS into my existing Rails application without a hassle. The trial period is perfect for testing the waters. The support is exceptional.
Cockpit CMS allows developers to utilize their normal stack of web technologies (for me, Laravel and VueJS) while still allowing the client to have full control over content-managed areas of the site. This is different from most CMS applications (e.g....
On the big picture, the graphical interface has improved, but I don't feel comfortable with the new Collections landing page. I would like to land on the page and have the items already divided by collection. For what concerns the single item of a...
Lack of option to preview the content is a big draw back. Documentation is also a bit difficult due to less number of features available. Need to be more iser friendly. The user interface is not that better. So difficulty in usage. Simple interface rather...
