Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Claude and Sourcegraph Cody 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (70.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$59.00 1 User Per Year
Claude
Star Rating
(56)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ClaudeSourcegraph Cody
Star Rating
(75)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00 1 User Per Year
Learn more about Sourcegraph CodySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Claude excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.3, making it a favorite among small businesses looking for straightforward implementation, while Sourcegraph Cody, with a score of 8.9, is noted for being slightly more complex to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that Claude's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.5, which some users find lacking compared to Sourcegraph Cody's higher score of 8.4, indicating a more responsive support system for troubleshooting and assistance.
- G2 users highlight that Claude's "Performance" in "Response Generation Speed" is impressive, but Sourcegraph Cody shines in "Contextual Understanding," where it has a better ability to maintain conversation flow, making it more effective for complex queries.
- Users on G2 report that Claude's "Customizability" is rated at 8.3, allowing for tailored solutions, while Sourcegraph Cody's flexibility in "API User-Friendliness" is rated higher, making it easier for developers to integrate into existing systems.
- Reviewers mention that Claude's "Data Security" and "Reliability" both score 8.5, which is commendable, but Sourcegraph Cody's overall "Update Frequency and Utility" score of 8.8 suggests it may offer more regular enhancements and features over time.
- Users say that while both products have strong "Functionality," Claude's "Accuracy" is rated at 7.7, which some users find less reliable compared to Sourcegraph Cody's performance in "Input Processing" with a score of 8.0, indicating better handling of diverse data inputs.
Featured Products
Sponsored
InsertChat
(3)
Machine Translation
Visit Website
Sponsored
Zencoder.ai
(4)
Machine Translation
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Claude
No pricing availableSourcegraph Cody
Enterprise
$59.00
1 User Per Year
AI & search with enterprise-level security, scalability, and flexibility
- Dedicated Cloud or Self-Hosted deployment
- Unlimited autocomplete and chat messages
- LLM Support & Flexible LLM choices including: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro and Flash Bring your own LLM key.
Free Trial
Claude
No trial information availableSourcegraph Cody
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
51
8.4
72
Ease of Use
9.2
52
8.8
72
Ease of Setup
9.1
23
9.1
67
Ease of Admin
9.1
11
9.0
5
Quality of Support
7.6
31
8.4
45
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
8
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
51
9.2
72
Features by Category
Algorithm
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Translation Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Offering Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Machine Translation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Recognition Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Facial Recognition
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Labeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.2
41
Not enough data
Interaction
8.3
41
Not enough data
9.2
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.0
39
Not enough data
Learning
8.6
42
Not enough data
7.5
39
Not enough data
Content Generation
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.4
39
Not enough data
System
8.0
36
Not enough data
8.2
37
Not enough data
8.1
38
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.7
64
Not enough data
8.0
64
Not enough data
8.2
63
Not enough data
8.0
63
Support
Not enough data
7.6
61
Not enough data
7.8
61
Not enough data
7.6
61
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
6.4
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
6.1
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Usability
7.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ethics & Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Coding Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - AI Coding Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Claude and Sourcegraph Cody are categorized as AI Code Generation
Unique Categories
Claude is categorized as AI Chatbots, Natural Language Understanding (NLU), Image Recognition, Machine Translation, and Large Language Models (LLMs)
Sourcegraph Cody is categorized as AI Coding Assistants
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Claude
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sourcegraph Cody
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
18.2%
Computer Software
14.5%
Information Technology and Services
10.9%
Consulting
5.5%
Higher Education
5.5%
Other
45.5%
Computer Software
35.1%
Information Technology and Services
14.9%
Program Development
4.1%
Financial Services
4.1%
Marketing and Advertising
2.7%
Other
39.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Claude
Most Helpful Favorable Review
naf B.
Verified User in Entertainment
It aims to be helpful wherever possible, without overstepping its capabilities as an AI. Anthropic designed Claude to understand and respond to human language in a conversational, contextual way. It has a cleaner interface than ChatGPT.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Jennifer S.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
It's often quite inaccurate and doesn't follow directions. Ask it to complete a task and it will complete a small subset then ask if you want it to proceed. This wastes your message alottment. It also makes mistakes, really obvious issues and doesn't learn...
Sourcegraph Cody
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Human Resources
I like that it can rewerite code in place
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Maybe the uder support its not great when its wrong and fixing its solution.
naf B.
Verified User in Entertainment
It aims to be helpful wherever possible, without overstepping its capabilities as an AI. Anthropic designed Claude to understand and respond to human language in a conversational, contextual way. It has a cleaner interface than ChatGPT.
Verified User in Human Resources
I like that it can rewerite code in place
Jennifer S.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
It's often quite inaccurate and doesn't follow directions. Ask it to complete a task and it will complete a small subset then ask if you want it to proceed. This wastes your message alottment. It also makes mistakes, really obvious issues and doesn't learn...
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Maybe the uder support its not great when its wrong and fixing its solution.
Discussions
Claude has no discussions with answers
Sourcegraph Cody has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
