- Home
- ...
- Transactional Email Software
- Amazon
- Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Email Delivery
- Amazon-vs-Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Email Delivery
Compare Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Email Delivery 
- Users report that Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Email Delivery excels in "High-Volume Sending" with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for businesses that require robust email dispatch capabilities. In contrast, Amazon SES, while still strong, has a slightly lower score in this area, indicating it may not be as optimized for extremely high-volume needs.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle's "Template Creation" feature scores 7.9, which is notably higher than Amazon SES's score of 6.8. This suggests that users find Oracle's tools for creating email templates more user-friendly and versatile, enhancing their email marketing efforts.
- G2 users highlight the "Mail Send API" as a standout feature for both products, with Oracle scoring 9.2 and Amazon SES at 9.0. This indicates that both platforms offer robust API capabilities, but Oracle may provide slightly better performance or ease of use in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Oracle's "Tracking & Reporting" feature is highly rated at 9.2, significantly outperforming Amazon SES's score of 7.4. This suggests that Oracle provides more comprehensive analytics and tracking options, which are crucial for optimizing email campaigns.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle's "Custom Tracking Domain" feature scores 8.5, compared to Amazon SES's 8.3. This slight edge indicates that Oracle may offer better customization options for tracking domains, which can enhance brand recognition and deliverability.
- Users say that while both platforms have strong "Performance and Reliability" ratings, Amazon SES shines with a score of 9.1, indicating a more reliable service overall. This could be a deciding factor for businesses prioritizing uptime and consistent email delivery.
Is not a good practice to have in the same server the web services and the email services. Sending emails use resources, and if you are hacked, you can send thousands of spam email from your IP and have problems. Using external service as Amazon, is the...
Because Amazon SES is so cheap and easy to setup it is sometimes abused by spammers. This means that it can have poor deliverability rates with major email providers. They keep a record of which IPs send spam, and penalise those IPs. They also prioritise...
it helps me to boost up my marketing solutions to deploy the same over the cloud
The Dyn email system has very basic logs and does not allow much history of the email headers passed in and out of the system. The analytical data is also very basic in comparison with other providers like Sparkpost or Sendgrid
Is not a good practice to have in the same server the web services and the email services. Sending emails use resources, and if you are hacked, you can send thousands of spam email from your IP and have problems. Using external service as Amazon, is the...
it helps me to boost up my marketing solutions to deploy the same over the cloud
Because Amazon SES is so cheap and easy to setup it is sometimes abused by spammers. This means that it can have poor deliverability rates with major email providers. They keep a record of which IPs send spam, and penalise those IPs. They also prioritise...
The Dyn email system has very basic logs and does not allow much history of the email headers passed in and out of the system. The analytical data is also very basic in comparison with other providers like Sparkpost or Sendgrid
