Compare Amazon MQ and CloudAMQP 
- Users report that Amazon MQ has a lower score in Asynchronous Messaging (7.0) compared to CloudAMQP (9.4), indicating that CloudAMQP provides a more robust solution for handling message queues effectively.
- Reviewers mention that CloudAMQP excels in Language Support (8.9) over Amazon MQ (7.2), making it a better choice for teams that require compatibility with multiple programming languages.
- G2 users highlight that CloudAMQP's Cloud-based Messaging feature (9.4) significantly outperforms Amazon MQ (7.2), suggesting that CloudAMQP offers a more seamless cloud integration experience.
- Users on G2 note that Amazon MQ's Policies and Controls (7.4) are less comprehensive than those of CloudAMQP (9.4), which provides more advanced governance and compliance features.
- Reviewers say that CloudAMQP's Activity Monitoring (9.3) is superior to Amazon MQ's (7.1), allowing for better tracking and management of message flows, which is crucial for operational efficiency.
- Users report that while both products have solid support, CloudAMQP's overall quality of support (8.6) is slightly lower than Amazon MQ's (8.8), indicating that Amazon MQ may offer a more reliable support experience.
We do not have to write any messaging code in application and setup whole complex infrastructure . Also it is very easy to bridge our own message broker to cloud MQ. Also has all the feature required like Queue and topic, persist messaging, distributed...
SQS seems like its better supported and that we may have to eventually switch to that
Our developers love it, they are the ones that started using it. it manages everything by itself.
The user interface lacks user friendliness making it difficult to monitor and manage RabbitMQ clusters. It would be better if CloudAMQP increased the UI making it more intuitive and easy for users to navigate and troubleshoot any cluster related issues that...
We do not have to write any messaging code in application and setup whole complex infrastructure . Also it is very easy to bridge our own message broker to cloud MQ. Also has all the feature required like Queue and topic, persist messaging, distributed...
Our developers love it, they are the ones that started using it. it manages everything by itself.
SQS seems like its better supported and that we may have to eventually switch to that
The user interface lacks user friendliness making it difficult to monitor and manage RabbitMQ clusters. It would be better if CloudAMQP increased the UI making it more intuitive and easy for users to navigate and troubleshoot any cluster related issues that...
